Basically it's the judges' bias. Close rounds go to the champion all the time just by default. So, in order to win a round against any champion you should make it one-sided, otherwise you will lose it. Look at GSP vs Condit. Condit knocked down and hurt GSP with a high kick in the third round, pounded him for a minute, I believe. The rest of the round was GSP's routine point fighting. Guess what? Only one judge gave Condit this round. That speaks to me about how judges are instructed to score title fights.
Basically it's the judges' bias. Close rounds go to the champion all the time just by default. So, in order to win a round against any champion you should make it one-sided, otherwise you will lose it. Look at GSP vs Condit. Condit knocked down and hurt GSP with a high kick in the third round, pounded him for a minute, I believe. The rest of the round was GSP's routine point fighting. Guess what? Only one judge gave Condit this round. That speaks to me about how judges are instructed to score title fights.
Basically it's the judges' bias. Close rounds go to the champion all the time just by default. So, in order to win a round against any champion you should make it one sided
Basically it's the judges' bias. Close rounds go to the champion all the time just by default. So, in order to win a round against any champion you should make it one-sided, otherwise you will lose it. Look at GSP vs Condit. Condit knocked down and hurt GSP with a high kick in the third round, pounded him for a minute, I believe. The rest of the round was GSP's routine point fighting. Guess what? Only one judge gave Condit this round. That speaks to me about how judges are instructed to score title fights.
In both fights that went the distance, the right man got the nod. That's really all that should matter.
How about hendricks lawler 2? 49-46 Lawler? :icon_lol:
Sometimes it's not just the champions that get preferential treatment from the judges. If judge thinks the promotion would rather Lawler wins, then he's the one they'll give the close rounds to.
Judges know if they play the game, they'll get asked back to do another show. Its a very bad career move to get a reputation for shitting on the guys they're trying to push.
Sometimes the judges motives are obvious. A classic case would be Lawler vs MacDonald. Lawler clearly won 2 rounds, but one the judges figured the UFC wants MacDonald to win, so scored the fight for him.
Sometimes it's not just the champions that get preferential treatment from the judges. If judge thinks the promotion would rather Lawler wins, then he's the one they'll give the close rounds to.
Judges know if they play the game, they'll get asked back to do another show. Its a very bad career move to get a reputation for shitting on the guys they're trying to push.
Sometimes the judges motives are obvious. A classic case would be Lawler vs MacDonald. Lawler clearly won 2 rounds, but one the judges figured the UFC wants MacDonald to win, so scored the fight for him.