Is it possible that Brock's USADA violation is from PEDs taken for WWE?

C

chamcham

Green Belt
@Green
Joined
Jun 9, 2007
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
75
We all know that WWE wrestlers often take steroids.

Is there proof that the drugs were taken during Brock's MMA training?

If they are WWE related, do you think Brock can get some kind of exemption?
 
Why would you get an exemption just because you're a pro wrestler? Is that supposed to allow you to cheat
 
Who cares? These drugs are called "performance enhancing" for a reason. He could have taken it for WWE, for bodybuilding purposes, he could have taken it just because. Why on God's green Earth should he get any kind of exemption?
 
This is some kind of middle schooler logic. TS, you can't be a grown adult with a job and bills and a fully functional brain.
 
sirmorbach said:
Who cares? These drugs are called "performance enhancing" for a reason. He could have taken it for WWE, for bodybuilding purposes, he could have taken it just because. Why on God's green Earth should he get any kind of exemption?
Click to expand...

The Wise One has spoken.
 
sirmorbach said:
And when you back me up I know I'm right.
Click to expand...

Haaa. Thanks. It's no problem, you were 100% right.

It's a shame that TS is from the old guard too. I expect better from a pre-2010 user.
 
sirmorbach said:
Who cares? These drugs are called "performance enhancing" for a reason. He could have taken it for WWE, for bodybuilding purposes, he could have taken it just because. Why on God's green Earth should he get any kind of exemption?
Click to expand...
I guess the idea is that if it could be proven that the UFC knowingly offered a contract to someone with PEDs (and expected the violation to occur after the fight), then USADA should fine the UFC itself (to discourage them from doing it again).
 
Brock is a part time WWE wrestler, he wrestles like 3 times a year.
 
Well if he took roids for WWE and not MMA, then that changes everything....
 
chamcham said:
I guess the idea is that if it could be proven that the UFC knowingly offered a contract to someone with PEDs (and expected the violation to occur), then USADA should fine the UFC itself (to discourage them from doing it again).
Click to expand...

I'd be ok with that, but it still doesn't warrant any sort of exemption for Brock himself. Fine the UFC and suspend his jacked white boy's ass.
 
chamcham said:
We all know that WWE wrestlers often take steroids.

Is there proof that the drugs were taken during Brock's MMA training?

If they are WWE related, do you think Brock can get some kind of exemption?
Click to expand...

Related to what? Exhausting your bodys "protein receptors" for bigger muscles to wrastle with?

So much roflcopter today its insane!

Ethan Rom said:
Brock "exempt" Lestard
Click to expand...

FTFY
 
All a fighter has to do is say they were taking steroids for an arm wrestling competition and they should be exempt! Great logic TS!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,254,349
Messages
56,641,436
Members
175,323
Latest member
IVO_DALMA

Share this page

Back
Top