- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
- Messages
- 34,003
- Reaction score
- 12,324
You are . . . but to me the differences are where and how you're doing it. One is for disciplinary reasons (on the butt) and the other (anywhere not the butt) is often because the parent is upset with the kid.
I don't disagree that there is a difference between striking out in anger and striking for discipline.
But you're still hitting your kid. There are tons of studies that show that spanking is bad for a child's development. But of course, it's battled by anecdotal evidence like "I was spanked and I turned out alright". Or even just useless conjecture like "look at these kids who don't get spanked, they are so bratty and entitled!", even though you have no way of knowing whether or not that kid you're bitching about has been spanked or not.
I was one of those kids who was spanked and "turned out alright".
Even though I grew up with anger and resentment issues that I'm only just now starting to get over, at 26 years old. Despite the fact that I've battled with mental health issues my entire life.
But those are my problems, and despite countless studies, there is really no way that any of it has to do with spanking.
At least I'm not an entitled brat, feel me?