1. Where did your likes go? Please Read This Thread »

Is It Better To Have A Dominant Champ or To Have It Always Changing?

Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by Ridian, Jul 26, 2016.

  1. Ridian Lifelong Combat Sports Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,437
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York
    What do you feel is better as a fan, to have a dominant champ that keeps the belt for 3-4+ defenses or to have the belt constantly switching hands every 1-2 fights?
     
  2. chitoortiz Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    15,010
    Likes Received:
    793
    Doesn't matter which one.

    Certain MMA fans will complain anyway.
     
  3. Chesten_Hesten The Wiener of Steel

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    14,394
    Likes Received:
    286
  4. Magx951 Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2013
    Messages:
    5,328
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    Depends. As a fan, I prefer seeing dominant champions just because I always find it exciting and interesting to see. As a marketing aspect, it's probably more about hitting a sweet spot; dominant but not so dominant that fights become predictable and "boring" to some fans, like GSP or Mighty Mouse.
     
  5. Ridian Lifelong Combat Sports Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,437
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York
    I think having a dominant champ crates that fan atmosphere of every fight being the "will so and so beat him this time"

    Having the belt always changing hands is also interesting because it creates the atmosphere of always wondering if this new guy will finally be the next dominant champ
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2016
  6. knowsitall Black Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2013
    Messages:
    7,258
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    Here
  7. accolyte1022 Machida eateng an sald Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    26,826
    Likes Received:
    1,385
    Location:
    Chernobyl Exclusion Zone
    Dominant.
     
  8. NHB7 Steel Belt

    Joined:
    May 1, 2002
    Messages:
    25,186
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Jose
    As a fan, something in between the options you provided.

    That being said, when it's a fighter I'm a huge fan of, I'd be happy to see them win the belt and successfully defend it into their late 80s.
     
  9. Teppodama Red Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2014
    Messages:
    9,411
    Likes Received:
    524
    Location:
    Online
    Dominance in longevity not dominance in quality. To know if a Champion is truly the best you need to see them really challenged, to see them dig deep to show the heart and tactical brillance of a champion.

    Nothing more irritating than seeing a huge obvious disparity in skills in the cage. At that point its just a filler fight with an almost guaranteed outcome.
     
  10. Benoitthegr8 Bum Life Practitioner Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,447
    Likes Received:
    260
    Location:
    Danger Close
    Depends on if said champ generates buzz
     
  11. laleggenda27 Brown Belt

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,975
    Likes Received:
    70
    In the short run, I think it's interesting when the division is wide open and the belt is up for grabs. But ultimately, I like when there's a clear number 1 guy. It restores order. And fundamentally, I like when the best fighter has the belt. The problem with the current landscape is that a number of the champions clearly aren't the best fighters in their division, and that almost cheapens the title of "champion" to some small degree.
     
  12. skipdean Orange Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2013
    Messages:
    349
    Likes Received:
    0
    For me, it's more about having legitimate contenders fighting for the belts. Handing out title shots just because a champ wants an easy fight or because a certain fight may be more profitable lessens my interest more than if the belt changes hands frequently between the best of the best fighting to be the best.
     
  13. KreamPuff Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    6
    I prefer having atble champions, however a few years ago when: Cruz, Aldo, GSP, Anderson, JJ owned their divisions, it did take the luster out of PPV's knowing the outcome was basically known.

    I prefer a mix of dominant champions and some up for grabs.
     
  14. felmmando Red Belt

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    7,996
    Likes Received:
    175
    Dominant champ. If nobody can defend a belt, it becomes a mere prop and the champion du jour, just another fighter.
     
  15. Emjay And again and again and again and ag.. zzzzzzzz

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2009
    Messages:
    32,431
    Likes Received:
    140
    I don't care. As long as mufuckas get punched, kicked and strangled.
     
  16. GrantB13 Black Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    5,310
    Likes Received:
    218
    2-4 defenses would be nice. I used to not like Silva purely because he was champ forever. That doesn't bother me anymore and I've been rooting for him since beating Sonnen the first time. I don't like situations like Holm beating Ronda, being touted as hot shit, TV shows and whatnot, then losing her first defense, then repeat with Miesha. LHW after Chuck too was all over the place.
     
  17. DaGenius Silver Belt

    Joined:
    May 25, 2008
    Messages:
    10,641
    Likes Received:
    0
    You need both long term. A dominant champ becomes sometimes that the promotion can build off of and then changing hands lends to parity and selling unpredictability.

    Woman's Mma would not be where it is if Ronda lost her 1st or 2nd defense for example.
     
  18. BOWHUNTER Gender: Attack Chopper Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2015
    Messages:
    1,877
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Mopping up liberal tears in the War Room
    I like to see greatness. Dominant
     
  19. OmegaRugal Red Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Messages:
    8,513
    Likes Received:
    93
    This.

    If a dominant champ exist ... their division is weak.

    If no dominant champ exist ... then its a fun division but none of them are that good.
     
  20. Ridian Lifelong Combat Sports Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,437
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York
    I agree with a mix of both. You have a dominant champ that keeps the belt for say 2-4 defenses but than loses it and the division is full of killers so it's entertaining to see who gets it next etc.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.