Discussion in 'The War Room' started by no fat chicks, Feb 21, 2016.
Especially in a first world nation where we put such a strain on the worlds resources
Depends on what race you are.
Only if they aint white lol.
"Where we put a strain on the world's resources."
Oh fucking please.
Say to your mother "I wish you aborted me. I hate being the cause of suffering of those in less fortunate countries. Fuck you, Mom!"
We need to have more children in Western societies. We are so dependent on immigration to keep our economies afloat that could easily be corrected if people had more kids.
Not if you can take care of them. If you're worth $1 billion and you can raise 15 productive, well educated children then I see nothing wrong with that.
that's not really addressing anything other than hurling insults. it's a legitimate point that having 10+ children is a fucking environmental disaster.
yea, imagine if we were a nation of worthless fucks like the duggars all consuming at this pace. we'd be legitimate locusts.
there's a difference between a person having 3 kids (which is a lot) and the fucking duggars shitting out an entire clan of morons. you absolutely bet they are immoral fuckwits, even without their child molesting son. who i assume has been cured by now of his mental illness by asking jesus for forgiveness.
In societies with low birthrates reliant on immigration, it would be beneficial for sustainability reasons if people had a lot of kids. Not everyone, but enough to stabilize the population numbers (or decrease the size slowly to account for automation while not being too disruptive)
In societies with high birth rates leading to social unrest you could make the case.
No but let's hope robots and clones takeover. Then we can all live like kings!!
Equal rights for robots.
It would be a lot easier for people to take care of large families if we had a better welfare system in America, which I think would be a good idea.
True but despite their more developed welfare systems Europeans still have very low birth rates.
Blessed is the man whose quiver is full of them.
Or people could actually work?
Simple Jack actually believes in wealth redistribution so its kind of pointless to bother
Keeping your kids in a quiver just doesn't seem right.
Better to keep them in the quiver than to shoot them at a deer.
Good point. I hadn't considered that.
Separate names with a comma.