I wouldn't expect you to see where I'm coming from, as I've noticed your particularly dim posts on here before.
If you can't watch Jones vs Gustafsson and grasp the difference between the way Jones employed wrestling in that fight and the way Cormier summarily employs it, then I can't help you really. It's already described in detail in my previous post.
You just don't get it man. Bookmark this thread and we can discuss again when Cormier wipes the floor (literally) with Gus. And then re-bookmark it so we can again return when DC has to go life and death to beat Rashad in his next defence (if Rashad isn't so rusty he loses to Bader, that is).
I'm not going to bother replying to you again on this thread as you're so dense it's just a bit boring really, but I leave you with this point: Hendricks was a much tougher fight for GSP than Condit was. This is because GSP relies on wrestling, and Hendricks was a good enough wrestler to shut that part of GSP's game down, and Condit wasn't. The principle could very well be the same with Cormier, Gustafsson, and Rashad. DC's smothering chain-wrestling will be way too much for Gus, but Rashad has a way better shot at shutting it down.
Ok, goodbye dear chump, until bookmark time on the night of 3rd October.