GOAT is subjective and it depends on the criteria being used to make this judgement
Is it winning only that counts? is it the way in which the champion won? relative rank of competition at the time is also very important
As much as I personally like George, I would say that Anderson's run as a champion was more impressive, although the last 2 fights certainly taint his legacy a bit
Is it winning only that counts? is it the way in which the champion won? relative rank of competition at the time is also very important
As much as I personally like George, I would say that Anderson's run as a champion was more impressive, although the last 2 fights certainly taint his legacy a bit