- Joined
- Nov 14, 2007
- Messages
- 752
- Reaction score
- 48
just read the rest of the thread, if youre thinking of competing down in age because people are talking shit then simply forget it-this is your journey, not theirs
I don't know how a sport that cares so much about titles won by relative novices (blue belt world titles, for instance) would discount titles won by older guys. The titles don't mean as much for sure, but that doesn't mean they mean nothing or they're worthless. The average BB Masters Worlds medalist is still a very accomplished and dangerous competitor that would school most hobbyist BBs. The only caveat I'd have is that if you win Masters titles you need to represent them as such, but that's not different than saying blue belts who win Mundials should be very clear they're world champions at a lower belt rank and are not really 'the' world champion.
Someone laughed at me once. Once...
Yeah exactly TLI bought him. They saw he was a black belt wearing a purple belt.
You must be a rape house shill.
I don't know how a sport that cares so much about titles won by relative novices (blue belt world titles, for instance) would discount titles won by older guys. The titles don't mean as much for sure, but that doesn't mean they mean nothing or they're worthless. The average BB Masters Worlds medalist is still a very accomplished and dangerous competitor that would school most hobbyist BBs. The only caveat I'd have is that if you win Masters titles you need to represent them as such, but that's not different than saying blue belts who win Mundials should be very clear they're world champions at a lower belt rank and are not really 'the' world champion.
When you turn 30, compete at Master 1 to see what it is like. I promise you it won't be as easy as you think.I'm 28 myself so still a few years away but I plan to never compete in masters but I understand people who want to have easier competition just like it made sense for me to fight other white belts as a white belt.
All the insanely roided out guys who compete in master divisions are absolute bitches tho.
The last few years competitors at Masters are definitely much stronger and athletic. I do believe alot are on TRT. That said, just like Adult, you don't have to roid to win Master Worlds.well masters has changed i remember masters divisions being 40 and above then all sudden ti started at 30 im 27 and i wouldnt do it unless im late 30s i know a guy who claims to be a world champ who does cross fit daily roids at 31 and goes in beating up guys in the hw division with no technique really at black belt i personally think masters should be for casuals who dont train super hard to go have fun not guys who barely make the age list but train 2 times a day ect
ALL OF THIS.
When you turn 30, compete at Master 1 to see what it is like. I promise you it won't be as easy as you think.
The last few years competitors at Masters are definitely much stronger and athletic. I do believe alot are on TRT. That said, just like Adult, you don't have to roid to win Master Worlds.
Doing “well” against hobbyist in their 20s isn’t the right metric to measure against.. at all. But like others said, the people dissing masters division are dumb
There is no shame in it at all. Competing is competing. You've put your nuts on the line.
The feeling of "getting laughed at" is a extension of "the adult division is the only one that counts" as posters above have pointed out. You won't get laughed at for competing. What you very likely will take a bit of ribbing is if you have success in competition and try to pass it off as more than it was. This includes the list below (which is in no way exhaustive):
- Trying to sell the fact that you won the open/adults division rather than any restricted division (be it weight, age, colour of gi, whatever)
- Publicly exhorting your grappling prowess in winning a division where you were the only competitor
Ha no I'd never do that. In fact at recent competition I lost my first and only match and could have still got a bronze but didn't want a participation trophy as it doesn't mean anything
im 33, 34 in october and ive never competed in masters
for me personally its probably because while i feel out of shape, i dont really feel like ive lost a step
the other thing is, do you want to go home with almost a guaranteed medal, or are you looking for the hardest matches you can get?
Masters Division is tough. I don't think anyone is trying to say that Masters is more difficult than Adult. The divisions get easier the higher up in Masters.There is nothing wrong at all with competing in the master's division, but I always think it's funny when the older guys say "masters division is so tough!" This is a silly thing to say, as the whole point of a master's division is that the level of competition is lower than the adult division. If masters is such a tough division, than what is the easy division?
For the most part, competing in the IBJJF adult division is a waste of time unless you're training at least five days a week. If you're not and you qualify, just do masters.
Had a couple of guys told me they don't compete because they would compete at Masters divisions and Adults is the only one that counts. They told me I can still compete at Adults if I want (even though I'm 36). I didnt know that last part and though it was mandatory I compete at Masters 2
Anyone here 35-40 who tried competing at Adult divisions? How was it?
I do quite well at my gym with younger guys in their 20s (basically 90% of the people there), but from competing I know its a whole different beast.