Is calling a writing a "short novella" redundant?

TheNinja

Steel Belt
Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
28,295
Reaction score
17,062
Is a novella by its very definition "short"? Is that like saying a short dwarf or a tall giant?
 
It's not redundant, it's a sign for readers that it's written by a pretentious hack.
 
What distinguishes a short novella from a long short story?
 
Is a novella by its very definition "short"? Is that like saying a short dwarf or a tall giant?
No, it's not redundant. In general, a novella is somewhere between 7,500 and 40,000 words in length, so I don't see a problem with calling a 7,500-word novella a short novella. Probably a better term for it though would be a "long short story", which sounds funny too but is an acceptable description.
 
So, it looks like the project's coming along nicely ...
 
Thank god im not the only one with countless sleepless nights worrying about this exact thing.

Sherdog is the community for me.
 
It's not redundant, it's a sign for readers that it's written by a pretentious hack.
Either that or written for total dummies who don’t know what a novella is. But then I doubt they’d read.
 
It's inaccurate. What you're describing is called a novelette.
 
If a short novel's a novella.

And a short novella's a novelette?

What's that make this?

joe-davola-the-opera-seinfeld-clown-kramer.jpg
 
it's like when ppl say 'close proximity'.
the word literally means 'closeness'.
 
Though I suppose within the parameters of whatever constitutes a novella there are short ones and long ones.
 
Back
Top