He appeared to be the weakest crowned World Champion ever at the time he won it from Tyson considering the betting odds or would I be wrong about that? How about later? It also seems that was the only great fight he had.
Everyones gonna say Charles Martin.He appeared to be the weakest crowned World Champion ever at the time he won it from Tyson considering the betting odds or would I be wrong about that? How about later? It also seems that was the only great fight he had.
Maybe if you want to say weakest undisputed champion ever. Modern era(3 or 4 belts)He appeared to be the weakest crowned World Champion ever at the time he won it from Tyson considering the betting odds or would I be wrong about that? How about later? It also seems that was the only great fight he had.
I'd take Douglas over multiple title holders of the 2000s.Maybe if you want to say weakest undisputed champion ever. Modern era(3 or 4 belts)
I mean there hasn’t been an undisputed champion since Lennox, so unless you’re saying him, which is wack, then idk. How many other even 3 belt holders were there since then, Wlad? Which surely you wouldn’t pick buster over.I'd take Douglas over multiple title holders of the 2000s.
The thread is about belt holders. You're shitting it up with the undisputed talk. It's not the topic.I mean there hasn’t been an undisputed champion since Lennox, so unless you’re saying him, which is wack, then idk. How many other even 3 belt holders were there since then, Wlad? Which surely you wouldn’t pick buster over.
If you mean single belt holders, then sure, perhaps
It’s relevant since Buster was a weak title holder and also an undisputed championThe thread is about belt holders. You're shitting it up with the undisputed talk. It's not the topic.
Does Botha count since he pissed hot after his win?I mean there hasn’t been an undisputed champion since Lennox, so unless you’re saying him, which is wack, then idk. How many other even 3 belt holders were there since then, Wlad? Which surely you wouldn’t pick buster over.
If you mean single belt holders, then sure, perhaps
Liakovich had some legitimate wins and was involved in a few very good fights though.Everyones gonna say Charles Martin.
But ill pick Francois Botha if we are counting him, since he won against Schulz but then it was ruled a NC.
So if he counts its him by far.
You can also add in guys like Siarhei Liakhovich in there as well
Ok but who was a worse champ and dont name Primo Carnera.Liakovich had some legitimate wins and was involved in a few very good fights though.
Then he still wouldn't be worst undisputed all time. It's still someone like Burns.It’s relevant since Buster was a weak title holder and also an undisputed champion
How about IBO champ James Thunder?Ok but who was a worse champ and dont name Primo Carnera.
No its not.Then he still wouldn't be worst undisputed all time. It's still someone like Burns.
That's a pretty good one but he wasn't that bad....he had some wins against former world champs thereHow about IBO champ James Thunder?
https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/5029
Yeah it is. By far.No its not.
I don't include IBO into this.How about IBO champ James Thunder?
https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/5029