He's not past his prime. He's simply not that good.
If he's that good, why does he keep losing?lol
WEC and UFC champ = "Simply not that good."
Never change, Sherdog.
If he's that good, why does he keep losing?
did = past tenseIf he's that bad, why did he keep winning belts?
If he's that good, why does he keep losing?
In other words, he's not that good.Because MMA is hard and he competes in the division filled with the most sharks lol...everyone loses at some point its part of the game..you sound like a douche who doesnt train...
Pettis could easily make another title run at 155 hes only 31 ...solid win agaisnt chiesa just needs to stay confident
did = past tense
how many belts has he sniffed lately
In other words, he's not that good.
TS asked if Pettis is in his prime. He is, he's only 31. I point out he's not that good, and hence he doesn't have the title.That's not the point.
You said, and I quote,
"He's not that good."
Obviously he is no slouch, to win TWO titles.
No....he just needs to train with a true master(baiter).i remember when pettis won the belt he said hes wasnt even in his prime yet....and then RDA came along. so what do you guys think? hes only 31.
TS asked if Pettis is in his prime. He is, he's only 31. I point out he's not that good, and hence he doesn't have the title.
What do you want from me?