Interviews BEFORE the judges decision?

Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by jwikked, Oct 10, 2013.

  1. jwikked

    jwikked Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2011
    Messages:
    858
    Likes Received:
    1
    What do you guys think about that? Would there be any merit to it, or would it just be each fighter making their best case no matter what?

    In the ideal world, an honest outlook before the decision was made would be incredibly interesting - however the judges would need to be tallied up and ready to go beforehand. You wouldn't want to influence scores based on interviews.
     
  2. nimw

    nimw Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    628
    Likes Received:
    4
    they would give really short answers b/c they want to hear the call.
     
  3. Chet Ubetcha

    Chet Ubetcha Asymmetrical Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2013
    Messages:
    953
    Likes Received:
    579
    Location:
    Hawaii
    More interested in hearing a fighter's thoughts after the decision, especially if it's an incredibly emotional win. However, I think there should be a fineable (is that a word?) ban on the answer "whoever the UFC wants me to fight next...".
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.