Interviews BEFORE the judges decision?

[jwikked]

What do you guys think about that? Would there be any merit to it, or would it just be each fighter making their best case no matter what?

In the ideal world, an honest outlook before the decision was made would be incredibly interesting - however the judges would need to be tallied up and ready to go beforehand. You wouldn't want to influence scores based on interviews.

 

[nimw]

they would give really short answers b/c they want to hear the call.

 

[Chet Ubetcha]

More interested in hearing a fighter's thoughts after the decision, especially if it's an incredibly emotional win. However, I think there should be a fineable (is that a word?) ban on the answer "whoever the UFC wants me to fight next...".