C
chokingvictim
Guest
It seems like the posts about BJJ instruction keep coming up, and questions are always asked about whether or not a purple belt in BJJ is good enough to learn under. I think it brings up an important distinction between traditional martial arts like karate, and BJJ.
In karate, someone who has not yet reached the brown or black belt level probably has not yet learned to control or defend well against a larger opponent of equal or greater athletic ability. However, a purple or even a blue belt in BJJ is probably more than capable of defending against larger guys, because they are probably used to rolling with bigger guys and have learned how to defeat them with little effort.
People are probably used to karate schools in their area, and the instructor is always a 40th degree black belt. They go to a BJJ school, and the instructor isn't even a 1st degree black belt?! They immediately question if the guy is qualified to teach them anything.
What is it that makes people think that someone has to wear the black belt to teach them something? Any thoughts?
In karate, someone who has not yet reached the brown or black belt level probably has not yet learned to control or defend well against a larger opponent of equal or greater athletic ability. However, a purple or even a blue belt in BJJ is probably more than capable of defending against larger guys, because they are probably used to rolling with bigger guys and have learned how to defeat them with little effort.
People are probably used to karate schools in their area, and the instructor is always a 40th degree black belt. They go to a BJJ school, and the instructor isn't even a 1st degree black belt?! They immediately question if the guy is qualified to teach them anything.
What is it that makes people think that someone has to wear the black belt to teach them something? Any thoughts?