- Joined
- May 9, 2010
- Messages
- 10,107
- Reaction score
- 1,795
It requires financial patronage in one form or another. I would also reckon the Jews are a disproportionate amount of researchers in general. But it does not matter. Again, saying you won an award does not mean you are smarter than everyone else because there are other factors in play.
It requires financial patronage in one form or another? So what is your point--that Christians and Buddhists would do as well as the Jews if they had that financial support? Well, as far as I can tell, they do have it. As I already pointed out, researchers are paid regardless of their faith. Anyway, you seem to grant that Jewish researchers produce top level scientific work at a disproportional rate. If you think it's not their intelligence that makes them so effective but something else, fine. Care to identify it?
Who were the great jewish thinkers pre-industrial revolution? Or just prior to, I guess if I have to pick a year, umm maybe 1850? Just out of curiosity.
Benedict Spinoza and Moses Maimonides come to mind. Why do you ask?
Albert Einstein built upon a lot of other people's work. I think he once said how he stood on the shoulders of giants. Also working in a patent office for intellectual property back then was probably better than being in R&D. I get stable pay and probably would get lots of free time to read, which is precisely what I think Einstein was doing.
The point remains that Einstein's finances were nothing special. I see plenty of bureaucrats and librarians who collect steady pay and have idle time. Why don't they revolutionize physics like Einstein did? As for standing on the shoulders of giants, you are confusing him with Isaac Newton. No scientist creates his field of study from scratch, of course, but the knowledge Einstein had of other physicists' work was available to everyone in the field.
I dont really know any ethnic group who takes a board game this seriously, nor whether or not the jews do as a whole. So I dont know how you can use it as an indicator.
If you're implying that non-Jewish chess players don't take the game seriously, I find that very dubious.