Nature & Animals Indian billionaire dies after swallowing bee at Polo match

[Beechwood]

Poor guy.

I remember being told by my sister that my brother in law has a severe allergic reaction to bees. Hope he doesn't accidentally down in bumble bee while playing a sport or other activity. I heard he is attending an Indian wedding soon. Hope no bees are in the area while he does an Indian dance.

 

[Aegon Spengler]

Bees are usually monarchists but this one was clearly communist

Red and yellow bees will save the proletariat

 

[KnightTemplar]

trained killer bee?

conspiracy brewing?

Spoiler

He was helping Iran's Mullahs move their cash out of the country in case their regime collapses. The, "bee" was a drone operated by Mossad.

Don't tell anyone!

 

[Jesus X]

Imagine casually claiming in public that black people are genetically inferior. Oh wait, that was mainstream sentiment not that long ago.

Black people have way better genetics than indians. This is silly.

 

[Dobymick]

I remember years ago the local news was telling about a guy that died after swallowing a bee when he was hiking somewhere and people were surprised that that could happen. Apparently he wasn't allergic and he was young and healthy

 

[Only Here for Attachments]

So much for billionaires being superhuman

 

[Uber_Noober]

Very unlucky.

This one time during summer I went to take out the trash without a shirt on and this mofo wasp came out of nowhere and began stinging me on my pec. The most painful sting I've ever felt

Been there too, on the neck, right in the hand, on the legs and arms.

 

[Uber_Noober]

A few years back I was on my roof, I heard something approaching, I looked over my shoulder and a swarm of bees was closing in fast. I had never seen that before, I was a long way from the ladder. So glad they kept on moving to where they were going or I would’ve been in a bad situation.

 

[MidgardSerpent]

Black people have way better genetics than indians. This is silly.

Black and Indian people aren't considered genetic categories in the world of science, it's a socio-cultural construct that makes sweeping generalisations based on surface level characteristics.

There isn't just one singular 'black' group, just as Indians aren't a genetic monolith. There is more genetic variation within those groups, than in between these so-called races. For the West, African people are just 'the blacks' even though there is more cultural, genetic, and pigmentative variation on that continent than anywhere else in the world.

So even from the get go saying X race is better than Y race doesn't make a lick of sense without some serious racist cognitive dissonance.

Assuming you're going off the 'explosive' or 'African cardio' trope to assert your case, are you also going down the rabbit hole of lower IQ and lack of academic success, 'being' closer to nature, and just overall being naturally less civilised? And since you're acknowledging a racial hierarchy, whites are in their turn 'better' than blacks? Which essentially would make you a white supremacist, if you want to start labeling things.

 

[Jesus X]

Black and Indian people aren't considered genetic categories in the world of science, it's a socio-cultural construct that makes sweeping generalisations based on surface level characteristics.

There isn't just one singular 'black' group, just as Indians aren't a genetic monolith. There is more genetic variation within those groups, than in between these so-called races. For the West, African people are just 'the blacks' even though there is more cultural, genetic, and pigmentative variation on that continent than anywhere else in the world.

So even from the get go saying X race is better than Y race doesn't make a lick of sense without some serious racist cognitive dissonance.

Assuming you're going off the 'explosive' or 'African cardio' trope to assert your case, are you also going down the rabbit hole of lower IQ and lack of academic success, 'being' closer to nature, and just overall being naturally less civilised? And since you're acknowledging a racial hierarchy, whites are in their turn 'better' than blacks? Which essentially would make you a white supremacist, if you want to start labeling things.

Lol this is leftist racism you just displayed here and you assumed I'm a white guy by calling me a white supremacist. I come from the caxcan indians in Mexico they are brown in color my grandpa looked like John redcorn. you also called black people low iq in your post. When you assume you make an ass out of u and me "assume".

 

[Tone C]

I kinda had that happen.

Except I got over being surprised faster than he did and spit him out before he could sting.

Had that with a wasp last year.

 

[Lycandroid]

had this happen to a friend but they survived. they were drinking coke out of a can and a bee went into the can and stung them in their throat. if they were allergic, they would be dead

it happened to me once on a construction site, got stung on my tongue, I could do a wicked gene simmons impression afterwards

 

[MidgardSerpent]

Lol this is leftist racism you just displayed here and you assumed I'm a white guy by calling me a white supremacist. I come from the caxcan indians in Mexico they are brown in color my grandpa looked like John redcorn. you also called black people low iq in your post. When you assume you make an ass out of u and me "assume".

I don't care where you're from, you don't have to be white to adopt white supremacist thinking, unless you want to argue internalized racism or adjacent values don't exist in this world. You are already pushing the racist narrative of an intrinsic racial hierarchy where Indians are 'clearly' inferior to black people, which means that in your mind other groups are also taking up a specific place on that imaginary ladder.

In the current climate, it's socially acceptable to say horrendously racist things about Indians based on stereotypes and pseudo-science, so let's see if you're as comfortable saying the same thing about black people, since you are going off race X is 'better' than Y. If you confidently assess blacks are better than Indians, then I'm sure you think that are other groups that are better than blacks, unless you are arguing they are already at the top of the food chain.


I already said from the start that it's nonsensical to affix specific traits to all black people because there isn’t one homogeneous black ethnicity. But for the sake of the argument, let's assume there is :

In what way are black people clearly better genetically than Indian people, according to you? Flattering stereotypes are still stereotypes, so if you're saying every black man is an athletic and muscular beast glistening with sweat, and Indians are clumsy and nerdy, and only good at spelling bees, then are you also acknowledging the other stereotypes wherein black people are often perceived as intellectually inferior to a lot of other groups? My mentioning of those tropes doesn't mean I agree with them so you're either are purposefully obtuse or you have very low reading comprehension.

 

[Jesus X]

I don't care where you're from, you don't have to be white to adopt white supremacist thinking, unless you want to argue internalized racism or adjacent values don't exist in this world. You are already pushing the racist narrative of an intrinsic racial hierarchy where Indians are 'clearly' inferior to black people, which means that in your mind other groups are also taking up a specific place on that imaginary ladder.

In the current climate, it's socially acceptable to say horrendously racist things about Indians based on stereotypes and pseudo-science, so let's see if you're as comfortable saying the same thing about black people, since you are going off race X is 'better' than Y. If you confidently assess blacks are better than Indians, then I'm sure you think that are other groups that are better than blacks, unless you are arguing they are already at the top of the food chain.


I already said from the start that it's nonsensical to affix specific traits to all black people because there isn’t one homogeneous black ethnicity. But for the sake of the argument, let's assume there is :

In what way are black people clearly better genetically than Indian people, according to you? Flattering stereotypes are still stereotypes, so if you're saying every black man is an athletic and muscular beast glistening with sweat, and Indians are clumsy and nerdy, and only good at spelling bees, then are you also acknowledging the other stereotypes wherein black people are often perceived as intellectually inferior to a lot of other groups? My mentioning of those tropes doesn't mean I agree with them so you're either are purposefully obtuse or you have very low reading comprehension.

"Brevity is the soul of wit" TL;DR