If the President does it, it's not Illegal

Can the President Obstruct Justice?


  • Total voters
    132

HomerThompson

Banned
Banned
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
41,443
Reaction score
0
Well, we all knew this was coming eventually. Apparently, it started before we even knew though. In January, Trump's team sent a letter to Mueller stating that it's impossible for the President to obstruct justice. This is completely ludicrous, and an affront to our Democracy.

Having said that, I look forward to the Trump Bots defending this incredible level of Executive overreach.


https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/02/politics/trump-special-counsel-memo-avoid-subpoena/index.html

Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump's lawyers argued in a confidential January letter to special counsel Robert Mueller that the President cannot illegally obstruct the Russia probe because he, as the top law enforcement officer, has authority over all federal investigations, The New York Times reported Saturday.

The 20-page letter from Trump attorney Jay Sekulow and then-Trump lawyer John Dowd, which CNN reported on last week and the Times has obtained, says that Trump could not possibly have committed obstruction in the Russia investigation because the Constitution empowers him to "terminate the inquiry, or even exercise his power to pardon if he so desired."
Trump's "actions here, by virtue of his position as the chief law enforcement officer, could neither constitutionally nor legally constitute obstruction because that would amount to him obstructing himself," Dowd and Sekulow wrote.
The two argued that "no President has ever faced charges of obstruction merely for exercising his constitutional authority" and that a President can "order the termination" of a Justice Department or FBI investigation "at any time and for any reason."


Trump's lawyers sent the letter as part of a broader argument that the President should not have to sit down with the special counsel.
Citing records handed over to the special counsel and interviews Mueller's team has had with White House staff, Sekulow and Dowd wrote in the letter, "In light of these voluntary offerings, your office clearly lacks the requisite need to personally interview the President."
 
If a president can't preside under the rule of law, string him up.
 
Thread poll is ambiguous. Could be interpreted as

"Is it permissible to do these acts if president" or "can a president be charged with these crimes?"
 
Of course. Is this supposed to be edgy?
 
Thread poll is ambiguous. Could be interpreted as

"Is it permissible to do these acts if president" or "can a president be charged with these crimes?"
I mean, "Can the President be charged with these crimes?". I was going to go with, "Can the President break the law?", but that seemed too ambiguous, frankly.
 
Pretty sure its if trump does it its not illegal
 
For what it's worth, I've always been 3edgy5u and wanted the sitting president to hang.

Nothing personal, Donnie.
 
lol, trump really got a handle on those leaks.

 
From The New York Times:

In a brash assertion of presidential power, the 20-page letter — sent to the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, and obtained by The New York Times — contends that the president cannot illegally obstruct any aspect of the investigation into Russia’s election meddling because the Constitution empowers him to, “if he wished, terminate the inquiry, or even exercise his power to pardon.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/02/...column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
 
Their position is that the President is completely above the law because he is the nation's chief law enforcement officer.


Totally insane.
 
Like it or not, it's true.

"The President is not above the law!" is a nice saying and all, but it's simply false. He is the law.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,254,469
Messages
56,648,970
Members
175,333
Latest member
dubhlinn
Back
Top