McGregor is 5ft9 with 74 reach, he's BIG when he fights at Featherweight. Nate is 6ft and has 76 reach, lanky, doesn't carry much muscle, fights at 155 yet his size was such a big factor in both fights ? Then why we can't use the same argument against Conor vs his opponents at FW ? Siver - 5ft7 (70 reach) Aldo - 5ft7 (70 reach) Mendes - 5ft6 (66 reach) Brandao - 5ft7 (69 reach) Brimage - 5ft4 (71 reach < wtf) Holloway - 5ft11 BUT has 69.5 reach Alvarez - 5ft9 (69 reach) Poirier - 5ft9 (70 reach) Only Nate and Holloway were bigger than Conor, only Nate had reach advantage on him. He basically admits he has problems with fighters that are bigger than him when he says "To beat me you got to have size" in that video before the rematch with Nate. The only guy he fought with that is basically his size at LW is Joseph Duffy AND he lost. So, Jon Jones got shit for having a giant wingspan and abusing the fuck out of it to win fights and many of his haters say he should be at HW. Why McGregor doesn't get shit for doing the same ? Why can't McGregor opponents cry about how big he was at FW ? So he really wants smaller opponents and really has problems against anybody with almost the same reach or bigger ?