- Joined
- Nov 12, 2014
- Messages
- 12,617
- Reaction score
- 14,471
Thread is not even remotely MMA adjacent. Mods need to start policing this shit or the heavies will soon become a generalized “combat sports discussion forum.”
You a cop or something? Shut up.Thread is not even remotely MMA adjacent. Mods need to start policing this shit or the heavies will soon become a generalized “combat sports discussion forum.”
Garner was a tough son of a bitch with some bad luck who seemed to survive the worst life threw at him. Got shot in the stomach with a bow and arrow as a kid, crashed his snowmobile stranding him in the wilderness and survived hypothermia with severe frostbite that cost him his toe, survived a plane crash and swam an hour in freezing water, and worst of all was matched up against the Russian Experiment Aleksandr Karelin and not only survived but won. May have been the lamest way to win possible, but he's the only dude in over a decade of dominance to be so lucky.
I'd pick present day Karelin against Abdulmnap & Khabib.Karelin would son Khabib so bad he'd think he was in an orphanage for black market children.
You're missing the point, my guy.He didn't win though, Karelin lost. Thats like winning a boxing match by blocking every single strike but not throwing one yourself either.
How did you think out this analogy?Karelin would son Khabib so bad he'd think he was in an orphanage for black market children.
I remember Gardner tried an MMA fight, but he did not perform very well.Gardner would have destroyed Karelin in MMA based on what we saw in their one fight a piece, he was a natural with his hands.
That brings up a point about A-level athletes and how they would do in MMA.
I definitely believe there is a correlation between athleticism and success in MMA, but people tend to think LeBron for example would make for the best fighter from the NBA since he's the best basketball player, but in reality there is probably some supporting role player out there that is way more talented for fighting. Even though the guy isn't as good at basketball, he's still an incredible athlete for being NBA level, and has more attributes for fighting.
Look at the difference in natural striking ability between Mitrione and Marcus Jones for example, while Jones blew him away as far as football talent.
Many also think Pacquiao won his fight against Mayweather, though statistics show the other way.I personally think Shaq would have crushed any version of LeBron in MMA. I'm still of the opinion that Shaq won his boxing match against De La Hoya, and that with a bit of training he could have become boxing's HW champ even in his old age after retiring from the NBA.
I remember Gardner tried an MMA fight, but he did not perform very well.
He did very well. Yoshida was not an all time MMA great, but he was solid and formidable. Gardner boxed him up and Yoshida couldn't get anything going.I remember Gardner tried an MMA fight, but he did not perform very well.
I was confused that Karelin tried repeatedly to do a lift instead of a rolling bridge even when he was having a 0-1 deficit.Yes he would have won. Gardner did nothing to win, Karelin did something to lose. 4 years later Gardner only won bronze.
Gardner would have destroyed Karelin in MMA based on what we saw in their one fight a piece, he was a natural with his hands.
That brings up a point about A-level athletes and how they would do in MMA.
I definitely believe there is a correlation between athleticism and success in MMA, but people tend to think LeBron for example would make for the best fighter from the NBA since he's the best basketball player, but in reality there is probably some supporting role player out there that is way more talented for fighting. Even though the guy isn't as good at basketball, he's still an incredible athlete for being NBA level, and has more attributes for fighting.
Look at the difference in natural striking ability between Mitrione and Marcus Jones for example, while Jones blew him away as far as football talent.
He does practice Sambo though.I wish we could've seen Karelin compete under freestyle -- he was such a force. I wasn't around the sport during his time (I'm 32), but he really is in a class of its own, seemingly.
He was just too big and strong for his opponent, and he failed to use his wrestling techniques well. That is why I think he did not perform well.He did very well. Yoshida was not an all time MMA great, but he was solid and formidable. Gardner boxed him up and Yoshida couldn't get anything going.
Now, maybe we should have known that a judoka wouldn't be able to throw a GR guy that outweighs him 100lbs. But the surprising thing was how he never really even got close enough to try (maybe I shouldn't' say 'never'; I certainly don't remember every facet of this fight 15 from ago).
I actually look forward to this thread being moved to the grappling forum, see how those guys answer your original question.
But he did win a gold in world championships in 2001. After that year, he flopped.Yes he would have won. Gardner did nothing to win, Karelin did something to lose. 4 years later Gardner only won bronze.
He looked surprisingly quick even with a manlet like Oscar, Oscar was shitting his pants too, I got a good laugh out of that clipI personally think Shaq would have crushed any version of LeBron in MMA. I'm still of the opinion that Shaq won his boxing match against De La Hoya, and that with a bit of training he could have become boxing's HW champ even in his old age after retiring from the NBA.
It was an exhibition match against a retired bloke who spends most of his time snorting coke and cross dressing.
The idea that Shaq could’ve become the undisputed heavyweight champion after retiring from the NBA is nonsense.
If by fail you mean 'tried but didn't succeed', then you're wrong. But if you mean fail as in 'consciously chose not to' use his wrestling, then sure.He was just too big and tall for his opponent, and he failed to use his wrestling techniques well.
His goal was to win a NHB fight. He created a winning game plan and executed it pretty fucking flawlessly.That is why I think he did not perform well.