Crawford loses to both.
I like Crawford vs. guys like Demarco or Herrera for his first fight at 140. Let him get the hang of the weight first.
What makes you say that?
I agree that Crawford probably got a bit too much credit for the Gamboa fight. He got tagged quite a bit early on in that fight.
Gamboa is a good fighter but shouldn't be fighting at 135 pounds, especially against a guy who is about to outgrow the weight division himself.
Even though it wasn't as good of a fight, I think I was more impressed with Crawford against Beltran than what I saw vs Gamboa. You have to wonder how Crawford would take shots from a good sized junior welter, when he got hit so much against Gamboa.
That is what I am saying. Broner has more power than Gamboa, and Broner CAN hit someone. He is very athletic. Crawford can't apply the same kind of offensive pressure Maidana can. And though Gamboa is a little faster and more mobile, it isn't like he was being an offensive whirlwind. He was being calculated and relying on his athleticism. That is what Broner does.
I would have picked Broner over Gamboa any day of the week at 135.
I would still favor Crawford a little, but that is a pretty even fight going into it.
Actually, now that I think of it, Crawford should probably stay at LW for a little while longer. Reviewing some of his fights, Crawford's needs to tighten up his defense, it isn't airtight, it's not based on reflexes or timing that much, rather, on size/range and his switch-stance style. Sure he can slip, but not when faced with real hand speed and footwork. Gamboa was landing on him pretty easily in the early rounds and seemed to be landing some damaging blows. Now admittadely, I'm not sure I can think of any guys at 140 who are as fast or have the footwork of an on-point Gamboa, but still, if a guy like say Matthysse or Garcia land on him, that puts Crawford in a lot of trouble, especially since they won't be at as big a size or reach disadvantage as Gamboa. I could still see him outboxing a guy like Garcia, and I think he'd win a boring decision over Broner. I could see him outboxing Matthysse, but if he gets in close with Matthysse, it's lights out IMO. I think Khan could be trouble, but I'm afraid his chin would fail him.
I don't why you laugh at Morales or Campbell? Maybe the Morales rematch Danny went though him in that fight but the first Fight Morales was live dog and what skills and tricks he had to give Danny a fight.
If you look back at how Danny came up around that time Campbell and Morals 1 happened, they were good wins. Danny was in the Prospect Stage and took on and beat Old School Vets in the types of fights were the Vets can spoil Prospect. When you look back on Danny's fights to get to the top, he Worked his way there. He went from Prospect to Challenger to Champion by fighting tried and true Named Fighters. I understand people shitting on him for Skia and Herrera(Herrera was a decent fight IMO) but I don't see why people can hate on him for the way he came up.
This is something that I'm afraid of as well. Matthysse might wear himself out from all of the wars he's been going to.
I see him going the way of Katsidis, too. Though Matty's name carries a bit more weight.
I'd say Crawford's style depends on who he's fighting. Against Gamboa, who is very fast, I think Crawford had to take more risks to catch him coming in like they planned for. I didn't see him do too much of that against Beltran, as he slowly broke him down and stepped up the pace once he was in control.
Against Matthysse, I think he would be more patient, given the power. Also remember Crawford can bang when he needs to.
Crawford would beat the brakes off Broner.