If Conor doesn’t fight Dustin next it’ll be the biggest Duck in MMA history.

I mean you make it easy. That's fine you can assume all fighters are dumb and we can assume all smart people are weak. If that's how you want to live your life. I mean if you are so smart, why are you interested in fighting then? Why are you watching fights and spending your free time on fight forums? You say you can fight and fought Baroni, but call fighters bottom feeders, so that means you would be clowning on yourself? Eh I doubt that. You seem to hold yourself in higher regard and like to look down on fighters so I call bullshit on your fairy tales fight stories.

Yes there is more to being a man than fighting. But it's one of the necessary skillsets to have. Men have always been protectors and the hunters from the start. You have to be able to protect the family/tribe and hunt for food to survive. Can't do that if you can't fight or if you are not willing to fight to protect your tribe. So you are trying to shit on the very nature of man. Yes you can say man evolved and everything is easier now with food in grocery stores and police to protect people, alarms for the house to protect your family, etc. But when something happens the weak still call for help, those are the people strong enough and capable of fighting the fights they can't. So strong men are always going to be needed to help the weak that can't help themselves.

I'll let you in on a secret, not all fighters or people that like to fight are dumb.

I didnt read all that but youre a lil gen z fan boy I get it. I've been around this game much longer than you and thats all you need to know. Goto sleep and get ready for zoom class tomorrow kid.
 
Biggest duck was Fedor vs UFC contract signing

Fedor vs opponents that aren't pro wrestlers or circus freakshows

Nah, he stood up for what he believed in. UFC said he would not be able to do sambo outside the UFC. Never sign a contract with a company that won't let you live your life the way you want.
 
I didnt read all that but youre a lil gen z fan boy I get it. I've been around this game much longer than you and thats all you need to know. Goto sleep and get ready for zoom class tomorrow kid.
I'm not gen z. But I'll accept your surrender.
 
bro you didnt have to murder him god damn
giphy.webp

I felt the sting for him.....damn
 
Some people like martial arts and fighting. It doesn't relate to not having intelligence. That's like assuming intelligence is reserved only for weak submissive people that don't know how to fight. You can be both. Neil deGrasse Tyson was a wrestler.

Plus you call them bottom feeders but take time out of your day to go on forums about fighting and spend lots of time watching their fights. Seems like you are just projecting a bit, you probably wish you could fight so you choose to hate on fighters instead since you lack the skills. You are too easy to read. It's like the people that hate on porn stars or onlyfans girls but watch porn and subscribe to onlyfans and follow the girls online and like all their pics. Do they really hate them, or hate that they can't have them?
LOL at picking Neil deGrasse Tyson as someone who symbolizes intelligence!

No offense but Tyson is just an edgy parrot science representative. I wouldn't be picking him at any point whatsoever as someone who symbolizes intelligence regardless of the wrestling credential that you wanted to use here as a fitting example.

If you wanted to use someone as an example of someone with intelligence, (although they are not used to be wrestler), use Edward Witten (Theoretical Physicist), Slavoj Zizek (Philosopher), Shinichi Mochizuki (Pure Mathematician), Terrence Tao (Mathematician), Robert Bresson (Film Auteur), Andrej Tarkovsky (Film Auteur), G.W.F Hegel (Philosopher), Immanuel Kant (Philosopher), Grigori Perelman (Mathematician), Alfred North Whitehead (Philosopher), Andrew Wiles (Pure Mathematician), and presumably many others of actually bright minds.

Carl Sagan, Michio Kaku and Jim Al-Khalili are way better physics representatives in popular culture compare to Tyson. Neil deGrasse Tyson had not done a single of at least notable, significant research in physics, he's just parroting the most popular view there is. He is like the Conor McGregor of physics lmao

upload_2021-4-13_13-1-27.png
 
Last edited:
Conor and Jon sitting in a tree
d-u-c-k-i-n-g

Some one finish that ^ lols - I'll give you a co-writing credit.
 
LOL at picking Neil deGrasse Tyson as someone who symbolizes intelligence!

No offense but Tyson is just an edgy parrot science representative. I wouldn't be picking him at any point whatsoever as someone who symbolizes intelligence regardless of the wrestling credential that you wanted to use here as a fitting example.

If you wanted to use someone as an example of someone with intelligence, (although they are not used to be wrestler), use Edward Witten (Theoretical Physicist), Slavoj Zizek (Philosopher), Shinichi Mochizuki (Pure Mathematician), Terrence Tao (Mathematician), Robert Bresson (Film Auteur), Andrej Tarkovsky (Film Auteur), G.W.F Hegel (Philosopher), Immanuel Kant (Philosopher), Grigori Perelman (Mathematician), Alfred North Whitehead (Philosopher), Andrew Wiles (Pure Mathematician), and presumably many others of actually bright minds.

Carl Sagan, Michio Kaku and Jim Al-Khalili are way better physics representatives in popular culture compare to Tyson. Neil deGrasse Tyson had not done a single of at least notable, significant research in physics, he's just parroting the most popular view there is. He is like the Conor McGregor of physics lmao

View attachment 847200
I used him as an example because he was a wrestler. That was the point of my post. It's hard to prove physics and most are theories. That's why there are a ton of different theories in terms of time, space, black matter, dimensions, multi-verse, black holes, string theory, etc. Physics is barely scratching the surface currently on what they can prove. The only point I was making is you don't have to be weak to be an intellectual.
 
Last edited:
Absolutely no way his fanboys can justify him doing this non sense about backing out of a charity donation and then saying the fight is off because of Dustin’s shady organization lmao. View attachment 847190
Like is there a worse duck you can think off because this will be the clearest especially if those two never meet for the trilogy.
they can and will.the fight will happen. but dustin will get paid way less.
 
Conor will likely fight. He's just being a diva as usual. He's an insecure little man.
 
I used him as an example because he was a wrestler. That was the point of my post. It's hard to prove physics and most are theories. That's why there are a ton of different theories in terms of time, space, black matter, dimensions, multi-verse, black holes, string theory, etc. Physics is barely scratching the surface currently on what they can prove. The only point I was making is you don't have to be weak to be an intellectual.
Socrates is a better example than Neil deGrasse Tyson if you wanted to use the word intelligence in the same sentence. Tyson is not that respected at all among working scholars.

5ec302303d8400c40ce08800a69b81e5.png
 
It's like the people that hate on porn stars or onlyfans girls but watch porn and subscribe to onlyfans and follow the girls online and like all their pics. Do they really hate them, or hate that they can't have them?
<{dootch}>
 
Biggest duck was Fedor vs UFC contract signing

Fedor vs opponents that aren't pro wrestlers or circus freakshows
Umm what? How many former UFC champs did Fedor beat up? He was a chubby middleweight who was fighting in HW without weight limit under pride rules allowing soccer kicks and stomps and the HWs were juiced to the gills. He ruled that division for a decade. I'm sure he was scared to fight in the UFC.
 
Socrates is a better example than Neil deGrasse Tyson if you wanted to use the word intelligence in the same sentence. Tyson is not that respected at all among working scholars.

5ec302303d8400c40ce08800a69b81e5.png
It's mostly because he's too outspoken and does a lot of media. They view him as "Hollywood". He gets a lot of media and press time so that can be an issue for others.
 
It's mostly because he's too outspoken and does a lot of media. They view him as "Hollywood". He gets a lot of media and press time so that can be an issue for others.
It's not because he was popular. Carl Sagan is far more popular, Stephen Hawking is far more popular but physics academics loves them.

It's because Neil deGrasse Tyson has no original idea of his own.

Every other popular physics spokesperson are much more respected.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,552
Messages
55,426,869
Members
174,773
Latest member
DREDATORXXXXL
Back
Top