I want to ban immediate rematches...

Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by kikikhan, Aug 12, 2015.

  1. kikikhan

    kikikhan Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2010
    Messages:
    9,667
    Likes Received:
    819
    Location:
    Slovenia
    I mean WTF is that?

    Cain vs Werdum AGAIN.

    And AGAIN if Cain wins.

    I mean what the f*ck is going on?
     
  2. Drake

    Drake Guest

  3. Hans Gercmiov

    Hans Gercmiov Titanium Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2010
    Messages:
    35,425
    Likes Received:
    54,057
    Location:
    Texas
    I think they're warranted in certain circumstances. This is not one of them.

    Cain should be banned from rematches.
     
  4. Stine 304

    Stine 304 Yellow Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2014
    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    60
    Yep. Unless it is some legit bullshit judging. I like Cain and think he can get his strap back, but let him have a few fights first.
     
  5. TheRuthlessOne

    TheRuthlessOne Violence Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2014
    Messages:
    33,262
    Likes Received:
    55,671
    Cant wait for cain to get hurt and pull out 2 weeks before the fight
    and then werdum will sit out and wait for cain
     
  6. CountOfSoCal

    CountOfSoCal Black Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2012
    Messages:
    6,741
    Likes Received:
    7,490
    Hey, they gave a title shot to someone who got KO'd in the 1st round, and openly talked about retirement multiple times afterwards. Why not just give the title shot to someone who tapped out to a choke after leaving the division in limbo for over a year?

    Ridiculous.
     
  7. IDGETKTFO

    IDGETKTFO White Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    11,761
    Likes Received:
    13,245
    Immediate rematches should be reserved for draws and split decisions only.

    Oh, and for the Silva limp dick riders, Clowning should warrant immediate rematches. Am i right? IS normal right?
     
  8. trane

    trane Red Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    8,082
    Likes Received:
    10
    That's why I was against Silva getting one, I saw this coming. I only support immediate rematches if there's controversy, otherwise they can just give rematches as they see fit
     
  9. r-harper-1

    r-harper-1 Red Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    9,041
    Likes Received:
    1,987
    Location:
    Kentville Nova Scotia
    What a joke ..... UFC fuck everything up
     
  10. IcyBlue

    IcyBlue Holla

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2003
    Messages:
    855
    Likes Received:
    9
    yep. bad move by the ufc. my interest level for this fight is 1/10. looks like they'll be promoting this hard
     
  11. sherbrosrule

    sherbrosrule Booty meat is really neat. Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2015
    Messages:
    531
    Likes Received:
    266
    Location:
    givenofucksville
    No what will happen is if Cain wins this rematch, there wont be an immediate rematch, because Cain will be hurt for the better part of two years.
     
  12. BisexualMMA

    BisexualMMA Don't Put My Name in the Name of Steroids!

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2010
    Messages:
    38,020
    Likes Received:
    77,991
    Location:
    Super Fight League Corporate HQ
    I'm all for some immediate rematches, like if there is no other contender and the first fight was close.

    This fight is an example of every reason NOT to have an immediate rematch.

    - Challenger is an inactive champ that held up the division.
    - Challenger got his ass kicked horribly in the first fight, not close.
    - Other contenders who are both marketable and on winning streaks.
    - Challenger has only fought three people in five years, and the champ is one of those three.
    - Champ actually has losses against multiple other viable contenders.
     
  13. fluffball

    fluffball Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,460
    Likes Received:
    2,460
    We don't need to ban them, I just stopped watching them. It's saving me a fortune.
     
  14. Great Angus

    Great Angus Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2015
    Messages:
    742
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    North Kilttown
    Don't stop there. They should also ban titleshots following a loss.
     
  15. Great Angus

    Great Angus Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2015
    Messages:
    742
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    North Kilttown
    It can be pretty bloody infuriating I'll tell ya. They have two obviously deserving contenders in the LHW and HW divisions and they blow them off for two guys coming off getting finished.
     
  16. TheCoward

    TheCoward Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2013
    Messages:
    1,719
    Likes Received:
    144
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    I'm actually totally behind you TS.
     
  17. Captain_Dammitt

    Captain_Dammitt Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2005
    Messages:
    4,245
    Likes Received:
    639
    Deal with it.
     
  18. abrasion

    abrasion Ancient one

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,990
    Likes Received:
    1,963
    Location:
    North of mexico, south of canada
    And you will never be a big org matchmaker....
     
  19. trblesome1

    trblesome1 Silver Belt

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Messages:
    10,746
    Likes Received:
    4,340
    Yea enough is enough

    Call up Dana and set this shit straight TS
     
  20. Thepaintbucket

    Thepaintbucket Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    13,791
    Likes Received:
    20,072

    And neither will you.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.