- Joined
- Oct 25, 2013
- Messages
- 30,678
- Reaction score
- 33,305
I always said when ESPN made that decision to foot the bill for ppvs for 300k buys, that Dana and co laughed their asses off knowing that today the average ppv does sub 300k. They probably tricked them by showing average ppv numbers from the previous 10 years, when illegal live streams were more difficult to access and internet speeds weren't universally geared towards high speed streaming, basically back in the blockbuster video era
Of course there are actually people posting on this internet forum RIGHT NOW, they are here among us at this very moment and they are foolish enough to believe ~60% of people who watch the UFC pay for ppvs, social media numbers suggest the MMA fan base is growing, all the media, all the followers point to growth, but ppv sales have only shrunk and people are still stupid enough to think a majority of fans purchase ppv. Boggles the mind. Some people think streaming sports illegally is like 3rd degree hacking, As if it isn't as easy as googling "MMA STREAM" and clicking the 1st link
Of course there are actually people posting on this internet forum RIGHT NOW, they are here among us at this very moment and they are foolish enough to believe ~60% of people who watch the UFC pay for ppvs, social media numbers suggest the MMA fan base is growing, all the media, all the followers point to growth, but ppv sales have only shrunk and people are still stupid enough to think a majority of fans purchase ppv. Boggles the mind. Some people think streaming sports illegally is like 3rd degree hacking, As if it isn't as easy as googling "MMA STREAM" and clicking the 1st link
Last edited: