Cos it's already been one. Tyson wasn't the next Tyson, or the next Ali, Tyson was Tyson. If there was a Tyson before him, and let's say Mike would have been called Mike Stratacciela, would we be talking about Stratacciela or about Tyson, the original one?
The only reason why there was a Tyson is because there was no Tyson before him. It's already been a Tyson, so that takes away any chances of seeing another one, cos a Tyson with a Tyson before him is not a "Tyson" anymore.
Hope that helps clearing the sight for people claiming for a second Tyson. It's not gonna be another. Just like the light bulb hasn't been invented twice.
Plus, Twitter, makes everything more gay.
The only reason why there was a Tyson is because there was no Tyson before him. It's already been a Tyson, so that takes away any chances of seeing another one, cos a Tyson with a Tyson before him is not a "Tyson" anymore.
Hope that helps clearing the sight for people claiming for a second Tyson. It's not gonna be another. Just like the light bulb hasn't been invented twice.
Plus, Twitter, makes everything more gay.