I know why there's not gonna be another Tyson

Gansu

Yellow Belt
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
229
Reaction score
0
Cos it's already been one. Tyson wasn't the next Tyson, or the next Ali, Tyson was Tyson. If there was a Tyson before him, and let's say Mike would have been called Mike Stratacciela, would we be talking about Stratacciela or about Tyson, the original one?

The only reason why there was a Tyson is because there was no Tyson before him. It's already been a Tyson, so that takes away any chances of seeing another one, cos a Tyson with a Tyson before him is not a "Tyson" anymore.

Hope that helps clearing the sight for people claiming for a second Tyson. It's not gonna be another. Just like the light bulb hasn't been invented twice.

Plus, Twitter, makes everything more gay.
 
If a guy comes out threatening with eating his opponents children, we'd be like, Oh shit this man is crazy/scary, or we'd be like, another Tyson wannabe..?
 
Have you not heard of the fluorescent bulb? Come on bro, don't spew BS.
 
Variations of the same concept.. not anything unique and ground breaking like Tyson or the light bulb.
 
You mean there's not gonna be another Tyson because there's literally not gonna be another Tyson? Oh shyt... That's crazy...
 
eddie-murphy-nodding.gif
 
No, of course not, just that you cant generate the same impact with the same tactics, and using other tactics would throw away any similarities to Tyson, so comparing new unique fighters to him would be impossible.
 
Wow, thats deep man. I have some thinking to do. Thanks for showing me the way TS, cheers. You may have just brought peace on Earth with that post.
 
If it is that obvious then why are people still claiming for another Tyson? For all I know Miley Cyrus could be the new Tyson and no one will notice.
 
Error 503 Service Unavailable

Service Unavailable

Guru Meditation:

XID: 766191744

blocked from server

<upgrade to platinum to post in new threads>
 
Tyson is Tyson

is normal

The Tyson is full of boxing
 
It's ok, I always wanted to give back to the community.
 
cos it's already been one. Tyson wasn't the next tyson, or the next ali, tyson was tyson. If there was a tyson before him, and let's say mike would have been called mike stratacciela, would we be talking about stratacciela or about tyson, the original one?

The only reason why there was a tyson is because there was no tyson before him. It's already been a tyson, so that takes away any chances of seeing another one, cos a tyson with a tyson before him is not a "tyson" anymore.

Hope that helps clearing the sight for people claiming for a second tyson. It's not gonna be another. Just like the light bulb hasn't been invented twice.

Plus, twitter, makes everything more gay.

hi mike, nice to see you post on sherdog!

Btw you are the most exiting fighter i ever saw
 
Back
Top