In 1900 agriculture represented 50% of American labor force by 1970 it was 13% in 2016 it was 2.8%. Did that crashed the whole system?
Yes, it did. It created both WWI, and WWII.
We had massive unrest all across the world.
No need, if we really reach a point where only coders are running the world we would be looking at a post-labor society, and either Skynet takes over the world or we simply as society move forward and start giving things out like universal basic income.
I'm all for that, which is why I don't like being called a Luddite.
But after getting fucked on global trade, you are going to have a hard time convincing me that we should trust that we will compensated after the fact.
Still waiting on all those tech jobs that were going to replace our manufacturing jobs.
You are literally saying that Unions should fight against technological advancements, thats the textbook definition of Luddism.
I'm saying that we should negotiate in our interests, aka the wage earners. And capital holders can negotiate in their interests.
I know that until you show me a viable and working UBI system, that you aren't promising me a post labor-society. You are promising me hopes and dreams, and I don't believe you.
The world was permanently at war before WWI and WWII the only different was that we got so much better at it than before, mechanized divisions, trains and the such meant that armies could move faster and do more damage and kill more efficiently.
You mean all the new technology the industrial revolution created was used in war, and it made it much worse.
Yeah, I'm aware. I'm also aware that WWIV will likely be fought with sticks and stones.
If wars stopped being a thing is because of nukes, and nothing would change that (except Skynet).
Show me a war between nuclear powers, and I will show you a mushroom cloud.
Just because two nuclear powers haven't went to war yet, doesn't mean they won't.