I'm saying that if the AFC East is so weak it's remarkable how many times their team is the one advancing to the Conference Championships, the Super Bowl, and the champagne room. We can talk about easy roads to the division champion seed all day, but avoiding the WC round does nothing to get you out of the divisional round (or the Conference Championships). I'm dismissing divisional parity and overall performance. I'm saying there's another way to look at this: that a division is only as "weak" as its best team.
This argument is tenable in the NBA where divisional seeding is less significant. It's a fair criticism to point out that Lebron has had a much easier road to the NBA Finals in the East, and that this has benefited his total appearances as well has his career individual postseason statistics. This shakes out because if you look at the past 16 years during his career, specifically those years where Lebron didn't himself carry his team to the Finals, the other teams in the East were getting their asses kicked, too. Notice the similarities, here.
Lebron has been to the last 8 consecutive NBA Finals, but setting aside his own less impressive record there, in the 16 years since Lebron has joined the league, there have been 7 NBA Finals that didn't involve him coming out of the weaker East. The West has gone 4-3 in those NBA FInals (they also won 4 in a row prior to that which takes us all the way back to the final Jordan championship). Now come back to what we set aside: Lebron himself is 3-6 in the Finals. So, even without admitting consideration of the West's domination in the regular season spread during this period, yes, it's fair to say the East is the JV conference, and has been for a couple of decades. They're 6-10 during his career, and they're 6-14 in the last 20 Finals. The weaker road showed its weakness when it came up against the competition. The NBA East sucks. Rubber hit the road.
Meanwhile, is that true for the AFC East in the NFL? In the same period, the past 20 years, the AFC has has gone 12-8 in the Super Bowl. So it's not the weaker conference. It has been stronger by the one-ring-to-rule-them-all metric. The AFC East has represented this stronger conference in the Super Bowl 8x out of those 20 appearances (with three divisions this is a disproportionate divisional share). The AFC East has competed for the honor of representing the AFC in the Super Bowl 14x out of those 20 years in the conference round. That means this year will be the AFC East's 15th Conference Championship appearance in the last 21 years. It has achieved this in the conference that has been turning out more overall Super Bowl winners.
So, really, who gives a shit if it's been easier for them to skip the Wild Card round? That's a flaccid naysay of Brady and Belichik. The Wild Carders have actually have done pretty well in the NFL playoffs. In the last 20 years they have made it to the Super Bowl 5x. More importantly, if that really mattered, then it's a mystery why this big-fish-in-a-small-pond effect isn't showing up on the AFC side of the playoffs for the AFC East.
From a winner takes all point of view, the AFC East has irrefutably been the best division in the best conference over the past two decades Brady has carried them.