So basically, the fact Reyes landed more for 3 rounds doesn't matter for these people. Instead, lets made up arbitrary BS criteria to give Jon the rounds anyway. Lets see: "Octagon control" "He landed a higher percentage" "He was moving forward. We all know the definition of fighting is moving forward." "Well, the difference in strikes wasn't that big, so the percentage of strikes landed becomes more important than the total strikes" "Yeah, he lost the rounds, but it was close, so it wasn't a robbery. It's ok to deprive someone of a victory if it's not a one sided beating" "Well...for championship fights you only win rounds if you destroy the champion." I have a few or my own even more convincing. You can use it if you want to: "Jon turned his back and ran, which showed he was winning because if you weren't better than your opponent you wouldn't turn your back to him. That shows you aren't concerned about your opponent because you're winning easily" "I think Jon won the rounds because by not landing much he was pretty much showing everybody he wasn't taking his opponent seriously, since those strikes were having no effect. It's a form of control. It's fighting arrogance. It's part of the judging criteria. I mean, when Batman was punching Bane, do you also feel he was winning the fight? Bane was just there chilling letting him punch"