Why did you respond if you just blatantly ignored everything I said?
Goodness.
Tony is nothing like Nate. Tony may be a better fighter nut he has NONE of the same skills or attributes as Nate
Tony has wayyy worse defense and boxing, then Nate
Yet Conor still out classed Nate
Like I said its funny, and so transparent, when "people" go "bu but it will be like Nate 1"
Why never the rematch? Why is that rematch always ignored? lol transparent
Conor vs Nate 1 was a rare freak anomoly where a staph Conor lost in freak upset fashion on short notice.
Since then Conor has improved leaps and bounds too
Conor vs Nate has nothing to do with Conor vs Tony.
Tony doesnt even have the chin of Nate.
There's only so many times Tony can get dropped and recover. Alvarez had great recover like Tony too. He still eventually got finished. IF Tony can survive the knockdowns then he's still going to be the much worse more tired battered fighter. Which would easily propel Conor to a decision over a beaten Tony (If Tony some how can recover from all of Conor's knockdowns) This isn't a video game where fighters stamina and health bars replinish after each round. This is reap life.
And that's even assuming that Conor doesnt outright flat line Tony. Tony literally RUNS in with uppercut leads chin up high. Tony running into a trademark Conor counter = devastating collision =the kind of collision that causes out cold knockouts
Stop with this Nate non sense
Lando who isn't 1% of the counter puncher Conor is, was counter fucking Tony and almost KOd Tony
Tony is tailor made to get counter fucked by Conor