- Joined
- May 13, 2012
- Messages
- 355
- Reaction score
- 0
This thread is hilarious.
- Betting odds are NEVER determined by who the "better" fighter is. They are designed to create a 50-50 betting pool. The people setting the odds want 50% of the betting money to be placed on Cain and 50% to place on JDS. There is NOTHING ELSE CONSIDERED when creating betting odds.
- The only matchup that matters when comparing JDS and Cain is...well...JDS vs. Cain. And that fight ended by knockout in about one minute. So yeah...it's kind of hard to argue with that.
- GSP-Serra is a very different situation. Serra had just won a "comeback" season of TUF, meaning that he was doing nothing before getting an immediate title shot. GSP is considered one of the greatest of all time, and Cain simply is NOT GSP. The JDS win is not considered an upset by any experts, unlike the Serra win, which is considered one of the biggest upsets in recent history.
Regardless of your opinion of points 2 and 3, your lack of understanding of point #1 makes me seriously question your judgement.
you moron, point 1) ALWAYS correlates who the better fighter is. And that 50-50 betting pool is only true when the betting odds that are initially created are far from optimal. Do you even brain? That's why betting odds don't change that much, it's not 50-50 entire time, not even close.