This. Valentina is a great f'ing fighter.Imagine thinking that Valentina Shevchenko isn't a great fighter.
Half of those 10 could and should be fighting at 135, but they dont want to do the dieting, in the end, Spencer could had fought 4-5 times at 135 to get her shot at Nunes, she only fought like once at 145 to get it, beating one of the worst "contenders" while at it.issue is, these divisions suck so much that someone else will come along right after her and also defend like 49 times. I honestly think there’s about 10 women’s featherweights on the planet and half of them are part time fighters. If you get one that’s slightly talented she can reign for a decade.
Volk lost to max thoughThey are both occupying divisions that are absolute wastelands with no talent. They are obviously both talented relevant to their competition, and will likely both reign basically until they hit their 40s or decide to retire.
But we shouldn’t be mentioning them in the same breath as someone like Khabib, Usman, Jones, or even lesser champs like Izzy or Volk.
They are more like the dudes who won belts in the early 90s MMA. You have to take into account that they aren’t fighting good people. Amanda beating up 72 soccer moms in a row does not make her as good as Volk beating Max twice, or Izzy beating Rob once.
The problem with intentional troll topics or topics meant to purposely trigger others is that people
actually attempt to response logically to them giving the topic at hand way more attention then it deserves.
better at grappling, better at striking. WMMA striking is robotic and planned, they get into range then auto fire their prerehersed combo. No feeling and moving like the men. Your logic would have people really believe Valentina is more technical and well rounded then Izzy because she wins via grappling unlike him and throws a wider range of strikes.And how was Rickson, for example, more well rounded than Valentina?