- Joined
- Jul 29, 2013
- Messages
- 2,459
- Reaction score
- 0
Im not too bothered about Palhares.
He has no one to blame but himself.
^Too dangerous for the UFC?
I thought Okami was bullshit, because of who he was, how good he was, and what it represented.
Weve all argued about the rights and wrongs, and how it reflects on the "sport".
One thing is for sure though.
UFC is rapidly redefining itself as a stylized MA org.
We could get into the trash talking and the twitter leagues, but its really not necessary.
By going to war with dominant wrestling, banning one of the best leg specialists in the world, and presumably edging towards recriminations against point striking, and holding on the fence, - all these things are taking out elements of effective martial arts, that are constituents of MMA.
Whatever you feel about it, it creates an undeniable reality, of a stylized MA org, in place of the traditional broad roof, MMA free for all.
He has no one to blame but himself.
^Too dangerous for the UFC?
I thought Okami was bullshit, because of who he was, how good he was, and what it represented.
Weve all argued about the rights and wrongs, and how it reflects on the "sport".
One thing is for sure though.
UFC is rapidly redefining itself as a stylized MA org.
We could get into the trash talking and the twitter leagues, but its really not necessary.
By going to war with dominant wrestling, banning one of the best leg specialists in the world, and presumably edging towards recriminations against point striking, and holding on the fence, - all these things are taking out elements of effective martial arts, that are constituents of MMA.
Whatever you feel about it, it creates an undeniable reality, of a stylized MA org, in place of the traditional broad roof, MMA free for all.
Last edited: