How would you react if Trump took this to court... and won?

[Shinobi]

Not gonna happen, but you'd basically see the biggest riots you've ever seen, probably some crazy attempt at invading the White House and for the next 4 years CNN and all the leftist media would dedicate all of its resources fueling conspiracies about Trump commiting some sort of fraud to steal the election. I mean, for much less we did spend years hearing about Russia being responsible for Trump winning, right? With no fucking evidence at all, and they still didn't let it go. Now imagine that plus 100. Oh, and they would triple down on the impeachment talk. Every day someone would claim Trum is getting impeached for his crimes.

 

[thehighking]

If LEGIT voter fraud is found to have occurred on a level that may have affected the outcome (ie. not 1-2 fraudulent ballots, enough to make a difference) AND the Trump campaign can prove it with irrefutable evidence.....well then fair enough. Hard to argue that.

With that said, Trump screamed bloody murder about alleged voter fraud in 2016 as well. He started a voter fraud commission and they found nothing.

https://apnews.com/article/f5f6a73b2af546ee97816bb35e82c18d

"The now-disbanded voting integrity commission launched by the Trump administration uncovered no evidence to support claims of widespread voter fraud, according to an analysis of administration documents released Friday."

So I would find it extremely shocking if the outcome here is much different.

If Trump was winning Democrats would start an investigation into non-existing Russian interference, it goes both ways.

 

[ImCertainOfCirkunov]

If Trump was winning Democrats would start an investigation into non-existing Russian interference, it goes both ways.

Ok..?

I don't see how your whataboutism has anything at all to do with my post that you quoted.

 

[The Big Bang]

I didn't deny anything. You guys need to stop trying to be so desperate with your "gotchas".
This is almost certainly going to the courts, and fraud will certainly be at the center of the debate. Lets be honest, we all know with how emotional progressive libs are- Of course someone pulled some BS somewhere and if so, it could potentially invalidate votes.

PA will reveal their count today.

It is LIKELY that Biden gets it.

THE. END. for trumpuppet

 

[KnightTemplar]

Dems would you resist if Trump took his voter fraud accusations to court, had evidence and won? If the Supreme Court decided the election and gave it to Trump, how would you react?

I'd love to see it; the meltdown on the left would be an epic for the ages. But it's not going to happen.

This is no longer a case of if Biden wins. It's when.

 

[Oceanmachine]

Not gonna happen, but you'd basically see the biggest riots you've ever seen, probably some crazy attempt at invading the White House and for the next 4 years CNN and all the leftist media would dedicate all of its resources fueling conspiracies about Trump commiting some sort of fraud to steal the election. I mean, for much less we did spend years hearing about Russia being responsible for Trump winning, right? With no fucking evidence at all, and they still didn't let it go. Now imagine that plus 100. Oh, and they would triple down on the impeachment talk. Every day someone would claim Trum is getting impeached for his crimes.

If he wins it means they will have 53 or 54 senate seats and he wont be impeached. Also the GOP is increasing House seats

 

[Captain Herb]

I'm a moderate, but if he took it to court and won.......then he won. What am I missing?

That the Supreme Court is partisan?

 

[Winstone]

The same way I would react if he takes it to SCOTUS and lost:

5:30 wake up.
5:45 beer
6:00 watch porn
6:30 breakfast and more beer
7:00 put clothes on
8:00 smoke a joint
12:00 phone friend
1:00 drink beer
5:45 smoke joint
6:00 more beer
6:30 annoy people
7:00 drink beer
8:30 drink beer in the back yard.
9:00 get ready for beer.

 

[nostradumbass]

That the Supreme Court is partisan?

Who on the court is a partisan, and for which party? Oh God, please embarrass yourself by saying you think John Roberts is a republican partisan, or Amy Barrett who hasn't even ruled on anything yet, or Breyer, or Kagan, or Sotomayor, or Brett Kavanaugh, or Gorsuch. There are exactly 0 justices appointed by republicans who reliably rule the way republicans want them to. The only people on the court who reliably rule based on what a political party wants are the liberal justices.

 

[Diogenes of Sinope]

Pretty much how I feel. Both sides would cheat if they could. Both sides would completely rig the election if they could. It's a matter of could they pull it off and I don't have good reason to believe that they could although I wouldn't rule it out.

Most rational post I've seen in the WR in a long time

 

[Prefect]

Most rational post I've seen in the WR in a long time

Most states, you couldn't cheat and win. Even in swing states, you would need to change the rest by hundreds of thousands of ballots to change the end result. Do you get what 100,000s ballots looks like and how organized you would have to be to make that many ballots go away? Logistically, it is difficult from just a numbers point of view. That is why election review groups have never found impacting issues involving presidential elections.

 

[Captain Herb]

Who on the court is a partisan, and for which party? Oh God, please embarrass yourself by saying you think John Roberts is a republican partisan, or Amy Barrett who hasn't even ruled on anything yet, or Breyer, or Kagan, or Sotomayor, or Brett Kavanaugh, or Gorsuch. There are exactly 0 justices appointed by republicans who reliably rule the way republicans want them to. The only people on the court who reliably rule based on what a political party wants are the liberal justices.

When was the last time Scalia, Thomas, Gorsuch, or Alito sided with the liberals on a major issue? Obviously Roberts wants to maintain the reputation of the Supreme Court so he sits on the fence at times, and while the jury is out on Kavanaugh, He will in all likelihood become a dependable republican vote on major issues. Amy? we don't know yet but it don't look good.

Don't show your ignorance. The Supreme Court is just as partisan as the House of Representatives, they just do a slightly better job of hiding it.

 

[Thecyborgmj23]

Person, woman, man, camera, TV




share images

 

[Clippy]

What if the numbers actually show trumpy lost WORSE

I would watch that shit on a widescreen

 

[Hans Gercmiov]

Here is exhibit A

2020÷666

 

[nostradumbass]

When was the last time Scalia, Thomas, Gorsuch, or Alito sided with the liberals on a major issue? Obviously Roberts wants to maintain the reputation of the Supreme Court so he sits on the fence at times, and while the jury is out on Kavanaugh, He will in all likelihood become a dependable republican vote on major issues. Amy? we don't know yet but it don't look good.

Don't show your ignorance. The Supreme Court is just as partisan as the House of Representatives, they just do a slightly better job of hiding it.

Um, Scalia died 4 years ago, and Gorsuch just ruled for some tranny nonsense a few months ago. Roberts makes preposterous rulings all the time. Judges aren't supposed to be activists or ideologues. A conservative justice just means they follow the actual law and the constitution, which everyone just admitted a month ago liberal justices don't do when there was mass screeching about "everything Ginsburg fought for", as if they're supposed to be judicial activists who "fight for" causes.

 

[wonderbread]

Dems would you resist if Trump took his voter fraud accusations to court, had evidence and won? If the Supreme Court decided the election and gave it to Trump, how would you react?

I'm not going to react...because he can take it to the SC and he will lose...

 

[wonderbread]

If there was factual evidence of fraud on a scale that would swing the election then I'd like those votes removed from the count. By fraud, I mean people voting twice, people voting without having registered, dead people voting, etc... I don't mean someone who dropped off their grandma's ballot on her behalf, or a church organizing a shuttle bus to the polls.

Fraud or not I'd like an accurate count of the votes to decide the election, not the judiciary branch of the government.

The thing is, I don't think it's even possible to perpetrate an organized fraud on that scale. Even if each co-conspirator could get their hands on thousands of ballots, you'd still need hundreds of conspirators to swing a state. I've never met 2 people who could keep a secret between them let alone 500.

If you wanted to rig an election, the way to do it would not be creating additional invalid votes. it would be getting rid of or switching the result of valid ones (like an intentional version of the video below from a Mississippi GOP primary).

McConnell was given the opportunity more than once to fix this security issue.. He shot them down each time.

 

[Chris Kyle is a liar]

Trump is about to lose to an old dumb pedo with dementia who didn't run on any populist policies. Very embarrassing for right wingers everywhere.

 

[Captain Herb]

Um, Scalia died 4 years ago, and Gorsuch just ruled for some tranny nonsense a few months ago. Roberts makes preposterous rulings all the time. Judges aren't supposed to be activists or ideologues. A conservative justice just means they follow the actual law and the constitution, which everyone just admitted a month ago liberal justices don't do when there was mass screeching about "everything Ginsburg fought for", as if they're supposed to be judicial activists who "fight for" causes.

Scalia was probably one of the most partisan justices ever, and I never said liberal justices were't partisan. They're all partisan. That's why the name of the game is to get as many of yours on as possible--even if you have to cheat to do it. trump already said he wanted Amy on the court so she could rule on his election lawsuits. That's so corrupt even for this guy that I bet she won't even go along with that.