How would Sherdog fix the economy?

[Greoric]

Why, reinvests them into their businesses, causing the economy to grow, more jobs to be created, thus providing greater and greater opportunities for workers, of course!

Had to make me blush didn't you?

 

[Prutfis]

We have a minimum wage, and why are you about putting a gun to people that want to work?

Really? How fucking dumb are you? One day you will grow up and have to support yourself. Good luck retard

 

[Greoric]

Universal health care is about collective bargaining. You idiot

Are there greater inputs and information for the factors of production with collective bargaining versus individual bargaining?

 

[Greoric]

Really? How fucking dumb are you? One day you will grow up and have to support yourself. Good luck retard

Not an argument.

 

[Prutfis]

Are there greater inputs and information for the factors of production with collective bargaining versus individual bargaining?

Dumb as a fucking rock. Did you take a class?

 

[Greoric]

Dumb as a fucking rock. Did you take a class?

Not an argument. But yes, I have taken a class. It was fun. We learned all about amplification cascades, G proteins, and lots of other molecular processes!

 

[Prutfis]

Are there greater inputs and information for the factors of production with collective bargaining versus individual bargaining?

Go to an online quote to sound smart. This is so fucking funny. Really? Individual vs collective bargaining of entire states...?
Please keep going. Your nazis were left is still cracking me up.

 

[ultramanhyata]

Look, a set of policies is not the same thing as a school of thought. If you open any microeconomics textbook, you're probably not even going to find the phrase anywhere in the text. There is no "supply-side" theory of consumption, inflation, etc. Surely you know the difference.

The schools of though associated with those thinkers isn't "supply side". Mises/Rothbard represent their own strands of Austrian economics, Hayek was a mixture of Misean and Classical economic thought, and Friedman started out as a Keynesian that later ended up levying some pretty significant critiques against Keynes (referred to as Monetarism).

I realize that this might seem pedantic, but the idea that "supply-side economics" represents a dominant school of thought in academic economics isn't realistic at all, and it's largely a result of misinformation (from left and right-wing groups). As someone who corresponds with actual economists, I've never actually heard the phrase being used by one.

The idea that demand is simply a consequence of supply is a foundational principle within classical economics. And the Laffer curve is a touchstone of supply siders.

It seems like you're trying to make the acceptance of supply-side economic theory among "real" economists equivalent to the level of respect shown creationism among biologists. And I think that's a huge distortion.

 

[Greoric]

Go to an online quote to sound smart. This is so fucking funny. Really? Individual vs collective bargaining of entire states...?
Please keep going. Your nazis were left is still cracking me up.

Who wrote anything about individual v. collective states? I asked which provides a greater amount of information for the factors of production. Individuals or a collective?

 

[Prutfis]

Who wrote anything about individual v. collective states? I asked which provides a greater amount of information of the factors of production. Individuals or a collective?

You shifted the posts.

And the collective provides better. Anyone who ever had a job would know that

 

[Prutfis]

I'm not low income. I'm middle class. Universal health care is a tax on the healthy and the healthy in the middle class. Because the middle class will be paying for it.
Which ones?

What systems?

You always have a beef with socialism and socialist practices.
Those practises would ensure you 6 weeks paid vacation
Paid eduction for all your kids.
More disposable income
Better retirement for you and your family. I'll

SO WHY DO YOU HATE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM

 

[M3t4tr0n]

Put all people on welfare to work building Trump's wall

Use all the cuts in welfare and health and refugee programs to pay for the wall

I guess you want the wall to look lik shit

 

[Greoric]

You always have a beef with socialism and socialist practices.
Those practises would ensure you 6 weeks paid vacation
Paid eduction for all your kids.
More disposable income
Better retirement for you and your family. I'll

SO WHY DO YOU HATE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM

Because it only assures anyone of 52 weeks non-paid vacation, and a lower of standard living.

You have no fucking clue what you're writing on guy. You're mixing the most unstable and tyrannical form of governance with the most inefficient way to produce and distribute resources.

 

[ultramanhyata]

Ask rip for specifics and he runs like a bitch because he can't rationalize

Christians like Rip have integrity.

He would rather see his child die because he couldn't afford to pay for the life-saving medical treatment than be party to some State sanctioned armed robbery where a billionaire was forced to pay an additional 10% tax rate to fund an expanded medicaid program.

Rip will be able to bury his boy with a clear conscience. And, bonus, Heaven will have a new angel in the choir.

 

[M3t4tr0n]

Change the currency to Rubles

 

[ripskater]

You always have a beef with socialism and socialist practices.
Those practises would ensure you 6 weeks paid vacation
Paid eduction for all your kids.
More disposable income
Better retirement for you and your family. I'll

SO WHY DO YOU HATE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM

Because with more socialistic countries, you get taxed more, and you have less freedoms than we enjoy in the USA. So I don't want more socialism. I don't want us to turn into Europe.

 

[Greoric]

Christians like Rip have integrity.

He would rather see his child die because he couldn't afford to pay for the life-saving medical treatment than be party to some State sanctioned armed robbery where a billionaire was forced to pay an additional 10% tax rate to fund an expanded medicaid program.

Rip will be able to bury his boy with a clear conscience. And, bonus, Heaven will have a new angel in the choir.

The argument then is those resources were verifiably better used there, and that the child had no other means of getting that treatment without compulsion?

 

[Greoric]

You shifted the posts.

And the collective provides better. Anyone who ever had a job would know that

I don't think you understand what's being asked. How does someone better represent the individual judgements of 350 million people than the individuals themselves? How do 10 people? How do 1 million people approximate that better?

 

[Jack V Savage]

Funny how a pretty reasonable thread idea has turned into a platform for bitchiness and crankery. Also funny how people just throw out their pet ideas (like rate hikes or marijuana) in a thread that has absolutely nothing to do with it.

The argument then is those resources were verifiably better used there, and that the child had no other means of getting that treatment without compulsion?

Your mistake, as always, is failing to see how compulsion is fundamental to market economies. Not like the hypothetical billionaire Ultra referred to would be a billionaire without compulsion.

 

[Greoric]

Funny how a pretty reasonable thread idea has turned into a platform for bitchiness and crankery. Also funny how people just throw out their pet ideas (like rate hikes or marijuana) in a thread that has absolutely nothing to do with it.

Looks like @Cubo de Sangre really doused you with that salt...