- Joined
- Jul 16, 2008
- Messages
- 27,021
- Reaction score
- 18,867
Convert retail/office building into indoor farming.
I dislike working from home all of the time. But I would be happy to do a 3-day/2-day split. Alternating 3 days at work/2 days at home and then 3 days home/2 days at work.
How do you make mojitos from home though? You ofering free delivery or something?
i'm torn. I like aspects of Wfm and aspects of being in the office. I will say that life is even more "Groundhog Day" when you spend your weekends at the same place as your work week. I've got weights at home, but I miss going to the gym during lunch.I dislike working from home all of the time. But I would be happy to do a 3-day/2-day split. Alternating 3 days at work/2 days at home and then 3 days home/2 days at work.
Working from home is nice, but I don't want it to be permanent. I miss the social aspect of work. Also, I have a heard time seperating work/life right now. I keep opening my lab top and working deep in the evenings, but maybe that will be better once the gyms open back up.
I may have a kid coming soon though, so I'd be happy to work from home for the next few years to save on childcare.
lol work and take care of a kid, dude you crazy. best luck.
I literally spend 90% of my time at work posting on internet forums. My job is a joke. It shouldn't even exist, but I'm the only one at my company who does it so no one knows that.
I really think productivity will hurt in the long run. It might be working fine for a month or so but eventually people aren’t looped in as they would be at an office. I could see in office days being reduced and less space rented out but that already was happening before this. It’s just accelerated now like a few other things were.
It can work. However it’s hard to implement if it wasn’t set up that way from inception because it requires more diligent hiring. It’s probably not for all industries. But companies like Basecamp have been fully remote for years and have figured out how to tackle communication. They’ve even written books about it.
Ive been on a fully remote team for about 3 years now and after a lot of work our communication is probably around 95% as efficient as it is in office. That’s fuzzy but essentially I don’t have any issues with my reports and communication at this job that I didn’t also have in an office setting in the past. I’m fortunate though, I don’t really have to make sure asses are in seats - I hold people accountable to overall productivity to begin with. I don’t care how people spend their days, but I expect two weeks worth of output every two weeks.
One thing I’ve found that’s helpful: pick a program, we’ll use Slack as an example, and treat it not like a chat application, but like it’s your office. No direct messages unless it’s actually sensitive. No “hey, where’s this file at?” in a direct message - instead everything goes in public channels. I’ve found during this time that people have a mental model for how they use these programs, and you have to turn that on it’s head. Everyone wants to DM questions to each other, but that’s not what you’d do in an office. You wouldn’t call colleagues into a private room every time you needed something or had information to share that wasn’t sensitive in nature.
Basecamp isn't hyper-focused on profits though. They are more outlier than anything in the tech world.
I don't like working from home and it is my opinion that my business should provide me with the suitable space and equipment to get my job done. We have the issue right now where you are expected to be available whenever. As everyone is stuck inside, there are no valid excuses for shutting down for the night and not responding. No real separation between work and home. Just because you can work from anywhere doesn't mean you should.
Right now I have the problem of one of my employees with nothing to do, putting in 14+hrs 6 days a week and 8 the other, and feeling and growing resentment towards others because the workload has been so asymmetrical. It's also compensation time and my boss doesn't get why I'm discounting this guy because he's putting in too many hours, it's not part of the job, and builds a toxic work environment if rewarded.
It can work. However it’s hard to implement if it wasn’t set up that way from inception because it requires more diligent hiring. It’s probably not for all industries. But companies like Basecamp have been fully remote for years and have figured out how to tackle communication. They’ve even written books about it.
Ive been on a fully remote team for about 3 years now and after a lot of work our communication is probably around 95% as efficient as it is in office. That’s fuzzy but essentially I don’t have any issues with my reports and communication at this job that I didn’t also have in an office setting in the past. I’m fortunate though, I don’t really have to make sure asses are in seats - I hold people accountable to overall productivity to begin with. I don’t care how people spend their days, but I expect two weeks worth of output every two weeks.
One thing I’ve found that’s helpful: pick a program, we’ll use Slack as an example, and treat it not like a chat application, but like it’s your office. No direct messages unless it’s actually sensitive. No “hey, where’s this file at?” in a direct message - instead everything goes in public channels. I’ve found during this time that people have a mental model for how they use these programs, and you have to turn that on it’s head. Everyone wants to DM questions to each other, but that’s not what you’d do in an office. You wouldn’t call colleagues into a private room every time you needed something or had information to share that wasn’t sensitive in nature.
I could see some places being efficient with it. The place I’m at and even the place before I don’t think it could work. Some of the team just isn’t tech savvy (and that’s not even the word, something simpler) so to even get everyone using slack is a battle. We also had maybe three or so different messenger applications at one point and it was a pain in the ass because I’d have to keep them all open to have access to everyone. Some didn’t use any of the three at all and you have to go up and talk to them if you needed something.
I could see that working with a public channel. The few times someone did that, it did start a conversation going that felt similar to an open office scenario. I’ll keep that in mind if we ever get close to one application.
Slack in particular has threads, which is great for breaking things out into topics of discussion (otherwise shit will get out of hand quick with 5 different conversations going on at once). There’s lots of ways to organize it - the key is just to have a way for everyone to “overhear” the conversations people are having. It’s passive and saves on a ton of future active (or not existent) conversations.
Maybe I know less than I thought. This is the first place I’ve used slack. Would threads be like drop downs from a channel? That has a lot of potential but like I said, I would have to get people out of the DM stage you mentioned.
This. So much this. WFH will tank salaries of jobs that were previously secure. Now instead of competing with your area for a job you are competing with the globe. Most of the world will work for far less.this will accelerate outsourcing for white collar employees everywhere. if you dont need to be on site to do work, then YOU dont need to be the worker. someone in india will do it.
Convert retail/office building into indoor farming.