How tough women act when men have shit handled...

[JabToucher]

Typical..

 

[ralphus1]

Buckwheat got knocked out his shoes

 

[Jack Reacheround]

“But BJJ doesn’t work on the street.” - Dudes who wasted their time training in Wing Chun

 

[Possum Jenkins]

Typical..

So typical I've never once seen something like this in the hundreds (maybe thousands?) of streetfight vids I've watched.

From the dialogue it seems like homeboy was whooping the girl, jiu jitsu dude saw it, pinned him down, and the girl took the opportunity to get back at him by throwing a few extremely girly, harmless shots.

 

[JabToucher]

So typical I've never once seen something like this in the hundreds (maybe thousands?) of streetfight vids I've watched.

From the dialogue it seems like homeboy was whooping the girl, jiu jitsu dude saw it, pinned him down, and the girl took the opportunity to get back at him by throwing a few extremely girly, harmless shots.

Typical as in seeing how a girl is tough once a guy doesn't pose a threat to them..........duh.


Honestly, you've never once have seen a girl act tough once their bf/white night steps in?

 

[Madmick]

So typical I've never once seen something like this in the hundreds (maybe thousands?) of streetfight vids I've watched.

From the dialogue it seems like homeboy was whooping the girl, jiu jitsu dude saw it, pinned him down, and the girl took the opportunity to get back at him by throwing a few extremely girly, harmless shots.

I've seen dozens and dozens of videos over the years where girls take potshots like this on a downed and controlled opponent. I've seen men do it more often, and more viciously, but dafuq is wrong with you that you would dismiss the battery she just committed as "girly, harmless shots." Jesus you're such a white knight. I must not have been paying attention because that lady didn't look like Amber Heard when I watched it.

Big respect to the man who imposed order and civility on the scene. He understood what she was doing was criminal. That's the difference between a white knight and a street knight.

 

[Possum Jenkins]

I've seen dozens and dozens of videos over the years where girls take potshots like this on a downed and controlled opponent. I've seen men do it more often, and more viciously, but dafuq is wrong with you that you would dismiss the battery she just committed as "girly, harmless shots." Jesus you're such a white knight. I must not have been paying attention because that lady didn't look like Amber Heard when I watched it.

Big respect to the man who imposed order and civility on the scene. He understood what she was doing was criminal. That's the difference between a white knight and a street knight.

No, he understood that what HE was doing prior to the video was criminal, which is why he was pinning him, not her.

The cameraman says he "was swinging on everybody," a bystander says "You was hitting a girl," and the woman herself screams "You was hitting ME, look at my face!" which paints the picture nicely. Homeboy was probably beating up the girl (or they were mutually hitting each other), hitting bystanders, so street knight pins him down to stop the violence. When he's subdued, the woman takes a couple of retaliatory shots.

But to you the shots from the far weaker person and apparent victim are what stand out. EqUAl RiGhTs AnD eQuAl LeFtS, amirite?

 

[JabToucher]

No, he understood that what HE was doing prior to the video was criminal, which is why he was pinning him, not her.

The cameraman says he "was swinging on everybody," a bystander says "You was hitting a girl," and the woman herself screams "You was hitting ME, look at my face!" which paints the picture nicely. Homeboy was probably beating up the girl (or they were mutually hitting each other), hitting bystanders, so street knight pins him down to stop the violence. When he's subdued, the woman takes a couple of retaliatory shots.

But to you the shots from the far weaker person and apparent victim are what stand out. EqUAl RiGhTs AnD eQuAl LeFtS, amirite?

It's not like women ever make ups lies or massively over exaggerate! #believe all women!

 

[Madmick]

No, he understood that what HE was doing prior to the video was criminal, which is why he was pinning him, not her.

The cameraman says he "was swinging on everybody," a bystander says "You was hitting a girl," and the woman herself screams "You was hitting ME, look at my face!" which paints the picture nicely. Homeboy was probably beating up the girl (or they were mutually hitting each other), hitting bystanders, so street knight pins him down to stop the violence. When he's subdued, the woman takes a couple of retaliatory shots.

But to you the shots from the far weaker person and apparent victim are what stand out. EqUAl RiGhTs AnD eQuAl LeFtS, amirite?

I'm beginning to wonder if you're just a troll, now. Given your post history it seems the most likely explanation for a post this stupid. Then again, I don't know, maybe you're just this dumb.

Crimes of assault aren't mutually exclusive. Her stomping and kicking him could be argued as self-defense if another man wasn't sitting on top of him, controlling his body as he lied prostrated and impotent, waiting for the police to arrive. This battery is literally captured on video.

 

[Possum Jenkins]

I'm beginning to wonder if you're just a troll, now. Given your post history it seems the most likely explanation for a post this stupid. Then again, I don't know, maybe you're just this dumb.

Crimes of assault aren't mutually exclusive. Her stomping and kicking him could be argued as self-defense if another man wasn't sitting on top of him, controlling his body as he lied prostrated and impotent, waiting for the police to arrive. This battery is literally captured on video.

Yeah, her battery was captured on video. HIS battery can be reasonably presumed by the actions of the witnesses. And it was likely much worse given as how he's the one getting pinned, he's the one who is getting commented on as "swinging on everybody."

The bystanders don't even acknowledge her stomps and only mildly reprimand her when she hits his face. This suggests his violence was far greater.

 

[JabToucher]

Yeah, her battery was captured on video. HIS battery can be reasonably presumed by the actions of the witnesses. And it was likely much worse given as how he's the one getting pinned, he's the one who is getting commented on as "swinging on everybody."

The bystanders don't even acknowledge her stomps and only mildly reprimand her when she hits his face. This suggests his violence was far greater.

Dude! Hes was restrained on teh floor. There was no reason for her to get stuck in at that point, regardless of what may or not have happened prior.

 

[Madmick]

Yeah, her battery was captured on video. HIS battery can be reasonably presumed by the actions of the witnesses. And it was likely much worse given as how he's the one getting pinned, he's the one who is getting commented on as "swinging on everybody."

The bystanders don't even acknowledge her stomps and only mildly reprimand her when she hits his face. This suggests his violence was far greater.

This has nothing to do with his battery, and the reaction of bystanders holds no bearing on the legality of her transgression.

Whatever you're sipping right now...lay off it. Your brain isn't functioning.

 

[biscuitsbrah]

Lol at you idiots picking sides. They were both dumb and deserve to get stomped

 

[Possum Jenkins]

This has nothing to do with his battery, and the reaction of bystanders holds no bearing on the legality of her transgression.

Of course it does, because it provides context.

 

[Madmick]

Of course it does, because it provides context.

So when one gangster shoots another gangster, and that guy survives, only to return in a drive-by hours later to shoot that guy, I suppose it isn't a crime because the first crime provided "context".

Listen to yourself. Stop being a moron.

 

[Possum Jenkins]

I'm beginning to wonder if you're just a troll, now. Given your post history it seems the most likely explanation for a post this stupid. Then again, I don't know, maybe you're just this dumb.

Whatever you're sipping right now...lay off it. Your brain isn't functioning.

Listen to yourself. Stop being a moron.

Jesus, you're one aggressive, belligerent spaz.

You're also astoundingly insecure who absolutely must have the last word in any argument (because that means you win), no matter how bad you're floundering, so this'll be my last post because I'm not interested in discussing something that's so obvious.

Your gangster example is piss poor and you know it. If the woman would retaliate at the guy and beat him so badly that she'd have to be pinned to the floor by a bystander while onlookers and the cameraman make approving comments, then yeah, she'd be going too far.

But no, it can be reasonably assumed by the street knight's actions, the cameraman's comments, the woman's comments (and the aggressor's reaction- notice how he doesn't refute her claim of hitting her) that his actions prior were much worse. So if she committed battery, he probably assaulted.

No go ahead and deliver your typical shitty argument-insult combo.

 

[Madmick]

Jesus, you're one aggressive, belligerent spaz.

You're also astoundingly insecure who absolutely must have the last word in any argument (because that means you win), no matter how bad you're floundering, so this'll be my last post because I'm not interested in discussing something that's so obvious.

Your gangster example is piss poor and you know it. If the woman would retaliate at the guy and beat him so badly that she'd have to be pinned to the floor by a bystander while onlookers and the cameraman make approving comments, then yeah, she'd be going too far.

But no, it can be reasonably assumed by the street knight's actions, the cameraman's comments, the woman's comments (and the aggressor's reaction- notice how he doesn't refute her claim of hitting her) that his actions prior were much worse. So if she committed battery, he probably assaulted.

No go ahead and deliver your typical shitty argument-insult combo.

Your subjective, assumed inference of proportion is irrelevant. I thought I might convey a simple truth to you contained in the adage, "Two wrongs don't make a right", something children already understand, conveying logic also legally valid, which is that just because someone has committed a crime against you doesn't justify a crime in return. That latter is conditional. She wasn't acting in defense of her body politick or her property. That man presented no further threat to her in her position. Her battery of the man was not justified.

 

[Hades86]

Ooof That stomp to the nuts tho.