How many top 10 wins Khabib and Conor each have?

You do when the guy in front of you loses their fight. smh, spend less time hating Conor, and more focusing on your lack of sense!
Siver vs Rosa took place on UFC Fight Night: Nelson vs Story - October 4th 2014.
McGregor vs Siver took place on UFC Fight Night: McGregor vs Siver - January 18th 2015.

Between those two cards these are the cards that took place:
  • UFC Fight Night: MacDonald vs Saffiedine
  • UFC 179
  • UFC Fight Night: Rockhold vs Bisping
  • UFC Fight Night: Shogun vs Saint Preux
  • UFC 180
  • UFC Fight Night: Edgar vs Swanson
  • UFC 181
  • The Ultimate Fighter 20 Finale
  • UFC on Fox: dos Santos vs Miocic
  • UFC Fight Night: Machida vs Dollaway
  • UFC 182

These are all the FW fights that took place on all those cards:
  • Jose Aldo (c) vs Chad Mendes (#1)
  • Darren Elkins vs Lucas Martins
  • Andre Fili vs Felipe Arantes
  • Diego Rivas vs Rodolfo Rubio
  • Ricardo Lamas (#4) vs Dennis Bermudez (#7)
  • Yair Rodriguez vs Leonardo Morales
  • Frankie Edgar (#3) vs Cub Swanson (#5)
  • Doo Ho Choi vs Juan Puig
  • Clay Collard vs Alex White
  • Renato Moicano vs Tom Niinimaki
  • Hacran Dias vs Darren Elkins

Mendes, Bermudez, and Swanson were all still ranked in the top 10 after their losses.
So no, what you're saying is inaccurate. Siver became #10 for defeating an unranked fighter.

And in case you ask, Darren Elkins was ranked #12. He's the only guy that was close to a top 10 ranking.
 
Last edited:
Diaz isn't top 10...
Even if he was you don't get to claim you beat a ranked fighter when you both fought at WW.
Just like Nate can't claim he beat the champion... He beat a champion, but not the champion of any of the divisions he fights in lol
Might as well book Mighty Mouse vs Stipe Miocic if that's how we're gonna roll.
 
Last edited:
Siver vs Rosa took place on UFC Fight Night: Nelson vs Story - October 4th 2014.
McGregor vs Siver took place on UFC Fight Night: McGregor vs Siver - January 18th 2015.

Between those two cards these are the cards that took place:
  • UFC Fight Night: MacDonald vs Saffiedine
  • UFC 179
  • UFC Fight Night: Rockhold vs Bisping
  • UFC Fight Night: Shogun vs Saint Preux
  • UFC 180
  • UFC Fight Night: Edgar vs Swanson
  • UFC 181
  • The Ultimate Fighter 20 Finale
  • UFC on Fox: dos Santos vs Miocic
  • UFC Fight Night: Machida vs Dollaway
  • UFC 182

These are all the FW fights that took place on all those cards:
  • Jose Aldo (c) vs Chad Mendes (#1)
  • Darren Elkins vs Lucas Martins
  • Andre Fili vs Felipe Arantes
  • Diego Rivas vs Rodolfo Rubio
  • Ricardo Lamas (#4) vs Dennis Bermudez (#7)
  • Yair Rodriguez vs Leonardo Morales
  • Frankie Edgar (#3) vs Cub Swanson (#5)
  • Doo Ho Choi vs Juan Puig
  • Clay Collard vs Alex White
  • Renato Moicano vs Tom Niinimaki
  • Hacran Dias vs Darren Elkins

Mendes, Bermudez, and Swanson were all still ranked in the top 10 after their losses.
So no, what you're saying is inaccurate. Siver became #10 for defeating an unranked fighter.

And in case you ask, Darren Elkins was ranked #12. He's the only guy that was close to a top 10 ranking.

No, what you're saying is inaccurate as per usual. Stephens lost two in a row. Chan Sung Jung left. You can have a debate whether Sivir or Lentz deserved the 8th spot. That's it. Sivir was already ranked 6th before the Rosa and Manny fight until he popped for juice. He was ranked in the top 5 before that. Stop making shit up to push your narrative. Conor does everything you think he doesn't. Deal with it.
 
Khabib has the whole undefeated thing which is nice but his wins have literally shit on Conor

Yea he ragdolled a pre strength and conditioning RDA but Conor would have KOd RDA if he didnt hurt his lil toe
 
At LW. The fight was at 170.

Good point still he was a ranked fighter so it should matter when discussing him especially when it was Diaz who couldn't make weight.

McG wasnt ranked at 170 either.
 
Good point still he was a ranked fighter so it should matter when discussing him especially when it was Diaz who couldn't make weight.

McG wasnt ranked at 170 either.

Yah, it gets a little dicey when you talk bout fights outside your division. Do you call Nate's win over Conor a ranked win? Mike Perry's win over Felder? DC over Silva...
 
Same...
The only diff is that Khabib never lost and Conor lost twice to a nobody

Edit: sorry we talk about 155...

Conor has 1 and Khabib a few more
 
Khabib

RDA (not even sure he was a top 10 at that time)
Barboza
Johnson probably was top 10, not anymore.

Conor
Aldo
Mendes
Eddie
were top 10 for sure.

Poirier & Max weren't top 10 when he fought then.
But looking at it now, it's pretty impressive.
Missing a few and wrong about Dustin.

Conors Top 10 wins.
Aldo C
Mendes #1
Alvarez C
Poirier #5
Nate #4
Siver #10

So 6 top 10 wins (5 top 5 including 2 champions)from 10 fights, more impressively Conor has 3 P4P ranked win in Aldo, Menses and Alvarez.

Ultimate fighter winner Brandao and future champ Holloway are also good names to have on the resume.
 
Last edited:
Are you that desperate to award wins?
Even if it is still a win, it warrants an * as his opponent had no training camp.

No, he was #5 on their second fight.
Not top 10 when they fought the first time. (he was 2-3 in his last 5 before Conor)
Wrong, nate was #5 in the first fight #4 for the 2nd.
 
Yah, it gets a little dicey when you talk bout fights outside your division. Do you call Nate's win over Conor a ranked win? Mike Perry's win over Felder? DC over Silva...

Then I guess we should make sure to clarify that Nate Diaz was ranked but at LW and this fight was at WW.
 
Raging al is going to be a joke conor pokes khabib with. Crazy al ain’t going to like that
 
It’s important to note the nature of the win. Conor destroys fighters, Khabib drags them down and lays on them.
 
Khabib has 5:

Barboza
Johnson
RDA
Healy
Tibau

Iaquinta was 11 at the time.

Conor also has 5:

Siver
Poirier
Aldo
Mendes
Alvarez

The Diaz fight was at 170 where both were unranked.
This is the correct answer/objectively fact.

Also, it was an objective fact that Siver was unranked until he had the "Conor bump" of being booked to pump Conor's resume/title shot.
 
Wrong, nate was #5 in the first fight #4 for the 2nd.
you mean AFTER they booked him?
Yeah, probably same way Siver was #13 and after signing the contract with Conor he became #10... UFC makes their own rankings however they see fit.

At any rate, they did not fight at LW, so it is irrelevant. (they were both unranked WW's)
 
you mean AFTER they booked him?
Yeah, probably same way Siver was #13 and after signing the contract with Conor he became #10... UFC makes their own rankings however they see fit.

At any rate, they did not fight at LW, so it is irrelevant. (they were both unranked WW's)
Siver is the only guy I can remember getting a ranking boost after the fight was made, unrelated but it's sad that guys like Siver have been branded a bum by so many as a way to discredit Conor, Siver was a top 3 FW at times during is career.
 
Khabib

RDA (not even sure he was a top 10 at that time)
Barboza
Johnson probably was top 10, not anymore.

Conor
Aldo
Mendes
Eddie
were top 10 for sure.

Poirier & Max weren't top 10 when he fought then.
But looking at it now, it's pretty impressive.


Max, probably not, still a decent win at the time... But if you are saying that Dustin Poirier was NOT a top-10 FW when Connor fought him, you are either confused or new.... He was a legit top-5/7 FW at the time they fought..

Unless I’m reading this wrong..
 
Max, probably not, still a decent win at the time... But if you are saying that Dustin Poirier was NOT a top-10 FW when Connor fought him, you are either confused or new.... He was a legit top-5/7 FW at the time they fought..

Unless I’m reading this wrong..

I was not sure if he was at that time tbh.
But yeah, dustin was always pretty good, now he's close to the top.
 
Back
Top