This troll includes Conor's loss to Nate as his new arbitrarily cherry-picked criteria of "ranked record" WHEN Nate was UNRANKED at both LW and WW the first time they fought, yet EXCLUDES Conor's win over Nate in the rematch when Nate was top 5 at LW
Also, none of Brock's opponents compare to Conor's opponents. HW is weak as shit.
Dustin Poirier was 16-3 when Conor beat him
Mendes was 17-2 when Conor beat him
Aldo was 25-1 when Conor beat him
Alvarez was 28-4 when Conor beat him
Conor's four top 5 ranked opponents had a combined 10 losses with a combined record of 83-10
Meanwhile When it comes to Bock's MUCH inferior 4 "top 10 wins"
Heath Herring was 28-13 when Brock beat him
Randy was 16-8 when Brock beat him
Mir was 12-3 when Brock beat him
Carwin was 12-0 when Brock beat him
Brock'a opponents had a combined 24 losses with a combined record of 58-24 which is pretty laughable
So Conor's opponents 83-10 combined record SHITS ALL over Brock's combined opponents record of 58-24
Not only is Conor statistically far superior to Brock
You just can't even compare Brock's shity HW opponents to the elite caliber of opponents Conor has dismantled.
You're absolutely off your rockers and hell-bent on an agenda against Conor.
Brock isn't in the same universe as Conor when it comes to every single metric possible you can think of
Conor has accomplished far more with a far superior resume while being far more impressive against far superior comp
Why are you even bringing up Brock in this. He isn't worthy enough to be discussed along side Conor. You are trying to muddy the waters
Khabib who's sherdog's new flavor of the month hypejob PAILS in comparison to Conor too resume wise/wins wise/performances wise etc
Did I just ether him or what
@Final Say ?