How is Signing CM Punk Different Than Signing Sylvester Stallone?

S

superpunch

Banned
Banned
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
21,164
Reaction score
4,677
They're both guys that don't kick ass but play guys who kick ass. How is it any different than the UFC signing Sylvester Stallone or Jim Carrey (Kick-Ass movies) and putting them against real fighters?

It's like putting Sylvester Stallone in a boxing match.
 
Stallone would get busted by USADA the second he signed with the UFC.
 
Would watch. Over and over. And over again.

 
Because CM Punk actually wants to fight
 
I laughed, thanks TS
 
Stallone wouldn't get licensed to fight based on his age.
 
fluffball said:
Mother of god I didn't realize how appalling bad those movies were in 2016.
Click to expand...

"Hi I'm Fluffball, my favorite movie is Avatar and I like My Little Pony. CM Punk is the best UFC fiter ever and I'm totally not a five year old."
 
Stallone would KTFO cm punk even in his current 65yr old body
 
TheWarTornJohn said:
"Hi I'm Fluffball, my favorite movie is Avatar and I like My Little Pony. CM Punk is the best UFC fiter ever and I'm totally not a five year old."
Click to expand...

I get you're trying to make fun of me but I literally don't understand how. Put some effort in to it, you can't just state random widgets and expect it to make sense.
 
fluffball said:
I get you're trying to make fun of me but I literally don't understand how. Put some effort in to it, you can't just state random widgets and expect it to make sense.
Click to expand...

If you don't understand then you're even younger than I thought, I'm sorry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,254,498
Messages
56,650,597
Members
175,334
Latest member
dubhlinn

Share this page

Back
Top