- Joined
- Jul 17, 2019
- Messages
- 1,644
- Reaction score
- 983
He was ahead of his time, a true visionary. He made good fighters look not good.
Stop stalking meMake up your mind. Thought it was Jones according to you.
Anderson past his prime looked better against Izzy than Whitaker did, change my view.
He shone against really bad competition. Half his defences are against journey men. And he most likely was on peds his whole career so it’s kind of a bit meh imo and puts a big question mark over his accomplishments. Heavily overrated by his delusional fan boys, even in his prime if he came into the division in the last 5 years he wouldn’t ever contend for the belt.
For PEDs to be a consideration you would have to believe that everyone else was clean and just happen to have a badly timed case of back acne (rhymes with "Shael"...).
https://www.mmafighting.com/platfor...l-easy-to-beat-drug-tests-even-now-with-usadasee, when you go to list what he has done to who, you can only name 3 fighters who are worthy to be mentioned in silvas reign. id actually even not mention rich but since he had to beat rich to get the belt i guess you need to include him. that is 3 names during his 10 defences. pretty poor level of competition.
shocking.
and i doubt he just used peds after the leg break. andersons fav quote was...
lmao dude shat in his own bed saying that.
Well I didn’t see you in your regular hangout, any GSP thread. So I figured I’d look here. Glad I found you.Stop stalking me
You can’t make the assumption the competition is poor because a superior fighter is good enough to finish the fight. Just like you can’t assume the competition is good because the slightly superior fighter cannot finish the fight.
You’re creepy broWell I didn’t see you in your regular hangout, any GSP thread. So I figured I’d look here. Glad I found you.
You’re a weird little goof. It’s an mma forum not your private little Anderson Silva tree fort. People comment on posts. It’s not called stalking.You’re creepy bro