- Joined
- Nov 10, 2005
- Messages
- 14,102
- Reaction score
- 116
Sadly, Hardy by KO.
Much better and younger versions of Arlovski were KO'd by hard punchers--but very non-elite fighters--like Datsik and Brett Rogers. Draw your own conclusion about how a slow, 39-year old Arlovski would do.
When was the last time AA picked someone apart on the feet? Roy Nelson in EliteXC? He wasn't even dominating Travis Fulton that badly until the literal last second head kick KO. And that was 8 years ago.
Sooo, you are implying Arlovski is now a worse fighter than in his very first pro MMA fight when he fought Datsit? Lol.
Browne and Bigfoot a few years ago.
A lot more experienced but also A LOT more damaged and slow. There's kind of a big difference between a 20 year old and a 39 year old who's been training and fighting consistently for 19 years.
Its not just about experience, its about skill. Arlovski was not even close as good of a fighter in his very fucking first MMA fight than he is now. Today Arlovski is still a decent top20ish HW even when he is clearly out of his prime, but the Arlovski that fought Datsik would probably not be even a top100 HW today.