How come Werdum wasn't critized for savagely attacking Colby with a deadly weapon?

[Scheme]

Werdum physically assaulted Colby with a deadly weapon, yet seemed to get off relatively scot-free, even with fighters and fans defending him.

Yet Conor is the devil because of what he did?

There is literally no difference in the situations that would warrant this level of hypocrisy.

 

[KYS]

Because of the lols.

 

[777 Others]

with a deadly weapon

Behave!

There is literally no difference in the situations

There’s a massive difference. Conor cost four fighters a payday/fight who had nothing to do with him. Also the repercussions of getting hit in the face by a dolly and/or glass are a lot greater tan a small bit of wood

 

[koquerelle]

Because he did it to someone who is hated

 

[dabouv]

Werdum physically assaulted Colby with a deadly weapon, yet seemed to get off relatively scot-free, even with fighters and fans defending him.

Yet Conor is the devil because of what he did?

There is literally no difference in the situations that would warrant this level of hypocrisy.

lets assume you are serious and retarded. You can’t think of any differences? No one got hurt. No card was affected. No innocent bystanders hurt. No group of thugs attacking a bus. No risk of screwing up MMA In a new coveted market. The boomerang isn’t deadly from 2 feet.
Are you joking or retarded? Conor isn’t the devil, he’s gotten too full of himself and likely too much Coke. He cost himself some serious money , he hurt th image of the ufc, he screwed a few fighters, and diminished a card that had already gone from great to meh.