...Trump is bringing in the guy (John Bolton) who championed invading Iraq based on that info? John Bolton is the quintessential Neocon from W's cabinet, who got us into these "stupid wars", and still insists they were the right thing to do. And he is obsessed with doing the same with Iran and thinks we should have done it long ago. We've now seen top CIA agents from the W era say they didn't give information saying Iraq had WMDs (http://www.salon.com/2015/05/20/george_w_bushs_cia_briefer_admits_iraq_wmd_intelligence_was_a_lie/), it was a lie that Neocons like Bolton and Cheney used to start war. But that doesn't stop Trump from saying he won't believe anything the CIA says, based on something (WMDs) that the CIA didn't actually say. And yet he'll appoint Bolton who "acted on CIA info" to invade Iraq. How does appointing this war-mongering idiot as deputy Sec of State fit at all with Trump saying he disagreed with the Iraq war and wants to keep us out of any other stupid wars? It just makes no sense...it goes against everything Trump said, and Bolton's brand of intervention in the middle east proved horribly ineffective. Let alone when we remember Trump's promise to drain the swamp but I guess we've seen already seen that was an empty campaign promise. Can anyone tell me how a Neocon like Bolton fits in with what Trump campaigned on? Or how Trump can say he was against the Iraq invasion, and then appoint Bolton??