- Joined
- Oct 8, 2018
- Messages
- 4,395
- Reaction score
- 1
Yet he did with Diaz lolThe next time Conor and Max fight is gonna be a five rounder, Conor doesn't have the heart or the stamina to survive that.
Yet he did with Diaz lolThe next time Conor and Max fight is gonna be a five rounder, Conor doesn't have the heart or the stamina to survive that.
... I just can't see Max eating Conor's shots for 2 rounds and surviving ...
Finally, look. Everyone improves, not just one person.
Hopefully we stop finally seeing this excuse. We know if Conor was in there and in shape he would piece him up, just like he would piece up Dustin.
Rematches should almost never favor the loser, unless it's a huge fluke.
Thanks. Done.
Regards,
UFCBlackbelt
He already beat both very easily.Max was starting to take over in the 3rd round and someone like Conor, who doesn't have good cardio like Dustin, is going to get drowned by Max's volume. When Conor is tired, he isn't going to Max like Dustin did.
Finally, look. Everyone improves, not just one person.
Hopefully we stop finally seeing this excuse. We know if Conor was in there and in shape he would piece him up, just like he would piece up Dustin.
Rematches should almost never favor the loser, unless it's a huge fluke.
Thanks. Done.
Regards,
UFCBlackbelt
Yes he beat a very green short noticed and injured Max in 3 rounds and not a LW Poirier.He already beat both very easily.
Conor is out of him prime though, I will give you that.
Even if your point is sound, your "logic" is flawed. At UFC 143 Max Holloway tapped to a Dustin Poirier armbar 3 minutes and 23 seconds into the first round. A five round decision is only an improved result for one fighter, and it's not Dustin Poirier.Finally, look. Everyone improves, not just one person.
Hopefully we stop finally seeing this excuse. We know if Conor was in there and in shape he would piece him up, just like he would piece up Dustin.
Rematches should almost never favor the loser, unless it's a huge fluke.
Thanks. Done.
Regards,
UFCBlackbelt
Pretty sure Conor had 1 fight in the UFC when he fought Max, so he was way greener. It was not short notice and Conor was the one injured.Yes he beat a very green short noticed and injured Max in 3 rounds and not a LW Poirier.
Conor is out of him prime though, I will give you that.
Conor was way greener because Max had a few more UFC fights than Conor? Conor was 13-2 compared to Max 7-2 with championship level experience in a relatively big European org while Max was brought into the UFC too early because he was a replacement for someone against Poirier. Max was the youngest UFC fighter at that time and if you think Conor "was way greener" than you are biased. And yes he replaced Andy Ogle to fight Conor and was injured earlier into the fight. Conor was injured during the fight. Dustin is more of a beast at LW and went further than he ever did at LW than FW. He even said the weight cut drained him. So you're wrong on all points.Pretty sure Conor had 1 fight in the UFC when he fought Max, so he was way greener. It was not short notice and Conor was the one injured.
And Dustin is a beast at any wieght.
I like Conor, but I have noticed a lack of stamina and a reluctance to attack in his recent fights.There's pretty much no way of knowing. He lost vs Khabib - but that - even haters must admit - doesn't really in itself point to being out of his prime. The fight before that he demolished Alvarez, and prior to that he won a gritty rematch vs Nate. The Floyd fight obviously doesn't count.
Conor being "out of his prime" is solely based on the things happening outside of the cage - and honestly, that's just pure speculation whether or not it affects Conor the fighter.
I still favour Conor over both and I'm the furthest thing from a fan. There's a chance Max takes him into deep waters and finishes him late, but I just can't see Max eating Conor's shots for 2 rounds and surviving. Dustin simply doesn't have the chin to trade with Conor. He's not glass jawed by any means but he gets hurt pretty much every fight he's in, and Conor for all his faults, still has great killer instinct.
With that said, both Dustin and Max have improved A LOT since their first fights with Conor. I just think he provides a bad match up for both guys.
How many ufc fights did max have when he fought Conor?Conor was way greener because Max had a few more UFC fights than Conor? Conor was 13-2 compared to Max 7-2 with championship level experience in a relatively big European org while Max was brought into the UFC too early because he was a replacement for someone against Poirier. Max was the youngest UFC fighter at that time and if you think Conor "was way greener" than you are biased. And yes he replaced Andy Ogle to fight Conor and was injured coming into the fight. Conor was injured during the fight. Dustin is more of a beast at LW and went further than he ever did at LW than FW. He even said the weight cut drained him. So you're wrong on all points.
So with your logic 16-0 Khabib coming into the UFC is greener than 7-1-2 Kamal because Kamal had more UFC fights. See how dumb your logic is? Or Israel who was undefeated and a champion outside of the UFC fighting Wilkinson who had UFC experience and you would think Israel is way greener? And kudos for ignoring the rest of my post where you were clearly wrong.How many ufc fights did max have when he fought Conor?
I'll wait Elizabeth, take your time.