DonkeyKong said:
You said "why not train for sport and carry a weapon", which is essentially the same.
No, read my original post you moron.
I said, "Why not just carry a gun/knife/mace/pepper spray for self-defense, and train BJJ for sport AND WHATEVER SELF-DEFENSE ASPECT YOU CAN GET OUT OF IT". Do you understand what that means?
And your "cool" little analogy/signature is still messed up. I never said, "don't go to college, just carry books." Just like I never said, "don't train MA for self-defense, just carry a weapon." Your sig/analogy is based on the notion of picking one or the other.
If you took the time to read my first AND second posts carefully, you'd see that instead of picking one over the other, I contend that it would be MOST effective for self-defense to train BJJ (either for sport, or self-defense, because even if you trained for sport, you'd get SOME benefit on the street) AND carry a weapon.
Much like it would be BEST to go to college AND carry books around.
p.s. Why are you so aggressive and hostile? Should we all just say, "OK, we agree with you?" Will that shut you up?