Hillary's e-mails not ready for public until just after election?

ehtheist

#FreeBanchan
Banned
Joined
Jul 29, 2015
Messages
6,280
Reaction score
0
So I've been seeing this on all sorts of alternative Conservative news sources this morning and while they tend to be biased as all hell, this does seem more than a little on the sketchy side. Am I reading it wrong? What do you guys figure - legit "it's just going to take too long" or is this a use of state power to protect the Democratic candidate until after the election? As these conservative sources are presenting it the State Department is holding back e-mails about Clinton's role in the controversial Trans Pacific Partnership until after the election. If you believe them it's because it's a big conspiracy to protect Clinton, but this is coming from people who likely have Rush Limbaugh's latest book on their bedstands beside their Bibles. Actually, does he even know how to write?...

The decision came in response to International Business Times’ open records request for correspondence between Clinton’s State Department office and the United States Trade Representative. The request, which was submitted in July 2015, specifically asked for all such correspondence that made reference to the TPP.

“The State Department originally said it estimated the request would be completed by April 2016. Last week the agency said it had completed the search process for the correspondence but also said it was delaying the completion of the request until late November 2016 — weeks after the presidential election. The delay was issued in the same week the Obama administration filed a court motion to try to kill a lawsuit aimed at forcing the federal government to more quickly comply with open records requests for Clinton-era State Department documents.

http://patriotupdate.com/state-department-orders-hillary-emails-sealed-until-after-election/

Does anyone have info from a more straight source on why these e-mails aren't being released? Or any info on the Obama administration supposedly filing a motion to slow down the federal government complying to open record requests regarding Clinton? Again, this seems sketchy as hell, but these are not trustworthy sources...
 
conservative news somehow manages to be even worse than liberal (mainstream) news.

I don't have any reliable information to add, just want to input that I agree that it's sketchy and find it hillarious that people can't see through Hillary's obviously sketchy past.
 
conservative news somehow manages to be even worse than liberal (mainstream) news.

I don't have any reliable information to add, just want to input that I agree that it's sketchy and find it hillarious that people can't see through Hillary's obviously sketchy past.

The article I was going to quote on this referred to what was going on as a really bad case of gerrymandering... Then I went with this one instead. I can't bring myself to quote a political news source that doesn't know what the hell gerrymandering is.

The sad thing is, while they are *really* biased and their journalistic quality makes me want to read NBC news, they oftentimes present things that the mainstream media doesn't. 3/4 of it is bullshit, but that other quarter really should be on the big news site main pages...
 
Just going to bump this once. Does no-one know anything about this? Does anyone have a link to any info on the lawsuit Obama killed? Or any more legitimate source commenting on the delay on the e-mails being released? I'm genuinely curious and I'd rather have a source that's a bit less slanted than the ones I'm finding, if such a source exists...
 
It all comes back to what people are willing to let slide. Looking at the past, they are willing to let a whole bunch slide in order to have a leader they feel more safe with.

Hot chicks pick bad guys and people pick sketchy leaders.

Maybe one day at least one of those statements will be less true ;)
 
/
Just going to bump this once. Does no-one know anything about this? Does anyone have a link to any info on the lawsuit Obama killed? Or any more legitimate source commenting on the delay on the e-mails being released? I'm genuinely curious and I'd rather have a source that's a bit less slanted than the ones I'm finding, if such a source exists...
Here is a good article about Obama's fight against the FOIA and transparency. It doesn't touch on any specific conspiracies tho.

https://news.vice.com/article/it-to...w-the-obama-administration-killed-foia-reform

Another
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/obama-administration-sets-new-record-withholding-foia-requests/
 
I don't think it's intended to protect Clinton specifically, as much as his continuous war against transparency.

That being said, I'm sure this specific information is in his, and the DNC's, best interest to suppress until after November.
 
Trump was able to push his Trump U lawsuits back until the week after the election. His lawyers contested that it would be too much of a distraction.
 
Trump was able to push his Trump U lawsuits back until the week after the election. His lawyers contested that it would be too much of a distraction.

Yeah, Trump isn't the presiding president though. Lawsuits get pushed back all the time - that in itself isn't so much of an issue. The issue is whether the current Democratic president is using the powers of the government to push back the lawsuit in question, which pertains to an ongoing investigation on a presidential candidate. That reeks of questionable use of power resulting in an effective coverup until past when the issue matters.

I'll have to watch Rama's CNN video later. Curious to see what a less biased source has to say on the matter...
 
we are so smart with our political parties that we are now forced to choose between the sword or the sharks
 
Back
Top