International Hezbollah ‘enters battle of reckoning’ with Israel as world powers urge restraint


Palestine and their terrorist chums are the little kid starting shit

Israel are the big lad ending it

And the Islamic supremacists are just sad to see the attempted bully get their comeuppance

Don't go starting shit with someone who can hit you back harder when they get tired of your bs
Reading all this news happen quickly...can Israel do any of this without America??
 
Hey Israel, there's some drone factories in Iran that could use your attention.
 

US out of step as world reacts to Israel’s ground offensive into Lebanon​

Many countries and global bodies call for restraint amid Israel’s expanded military operations, but the US offers support.

The United States appeared out of step with the rest of the globe as it pledged its support for Israel’s ground incursion into Lebanon.

While voices from across the world on Tuesday urged a ceasefire and a step back from the brink of all-out war, Washington declared the “limited” ground offensive into southern Lebanon as “Israel’s right to defend itself”.

Israeli troops advanced into Lebanon overnight on Tuesday in a widely anticipated move. The military said in a statement that the raids were “limited, localised and targeted” against Hezbollah.

However, the advance further raises the risk of a wider escalation in the fight with the Iran-backed armed group or even across the region, and the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Japan have all been quick to express concern.

US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said he told his Israeli counterpart, Yoav Gallant, that Washington agrees on the need for a ground offensive to rid Lebanon’s southern border area of Hezbollah weapons and other means it can use to carry out attacks across the border.

“I made it clear that the United States supports Israel’s right to defend itself,” Austin said.

The White House National Security Council made a similar statement on Tuesday, justifying Israel’s “limited operations”.

It also added that it remains against the expansion of the ground assault and that a diplomatic solution is the only way to achieve lasting stability along Israel’s border with Lebanon.

‘Most dangerous’

Lebanon’s caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati warned that his country is facing “one of the most dangerous phases of its history” and urged the United Nations to provide aid for one million people displaced by Israel’s attacks over recent weeks.

“We urgently call for more aid to reinforce our ongoing efforts to provide basic support to displaced civilians,” Mikati said in a meeting with the UN representatives.

The UN’s humanitarian coordinator for Lebanon, Imran Riza, announced the launch of a $426m “flash appeal” for urgent humanitarian aid for civilians caught up in the conflict.

“Without sufficient resources, humanitarians risk leaving the population of an entire country without the support they urgently require,” Riza warned.

However, he added that no amount of aid can fully address the crisis if civilians continue to be targeted.

Liz Throssell, spokeswoman for the UN rights office, warned against “a large-scale ground invasion” that would only result in “greater suffering”.

INTERACTIVE-Israel-sends-ground-troops-into-Lebanon-1727773314.png

‘Territorial integrity’

The new phase of the Israeli operation sent alarm quickly spreading through the Middle East.

The United Nations’ peacekeeping force in Lebanon condemned the offensive, saying it violates Lebanon’s “sovereignty and territorial integrity”.

The UAE’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed “deep concern” over the escalation in fighting and “reaffirmed its unwavering position towards the unity of Lebanon, national sovereignty, and territorial integrity”.

The statement called for international support to prevent further escalation and stressed the importance of providing full protection to civilians.

President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan has “directed the delivery of an urgent $100m relief package to the people of Lebanon”, the ministry added.

Qatar’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Mohammed bin Abdulaziz al-Khulaifi warned on X that “aggression on Lebanon will inflict the worst”.

“Now more than ever, it needs our unwavering support to safeguard the country’s integrity and security. Standing with the brotherly people of Lebanon is not just a moral duty, but an imperative necessity,” he said.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024...acts-to-israels-ground-offensive-into-lebanon
 
After completely ratfucking Hezbollah's leadership and communications I doubt there will be much organized resistance from them.

Israel will just make their buffer zone and no one is going to do shit about it.
 

US out of step as world reacts to Israel’s ground offensive into Lebanon​

Many countries and global bodies call for restraint amid Israel’s expanded military operations, but the US offers support.

The United States appeared out of step with the rest of the globe as it pledged its support for Israel’s ground incursion into Lebanon.

While voices from across the world on Tuesday urged a ceasefire and a step back from the brink of all-out war, Washington declared the “limited” ground offensive into southern Lebanon as “Israel’s right to defend itself”.

Israeli troops advanced into Lebanon overnight on Tuesday in a widely anticipated move. The military said in a statement that the raids were “limited, localised and targeted” against Hezbollah.

However, the advance further raises the risk of a wider escalation in the fight with the Iran-backed armed group or even across the region, and the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Japan have all been quick to express concern.

US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said he told his Israeli counterpart, Yoav Gallant, that Washington agrees on the need for a ground offensive to rid Lebanon’s southern border area of Hezbollah weapons and other means it can use to carry out attacks across the border.

“I made it clear that the United States supports Israel’s right to defend itself,” Austin said.

The White House National Security Council made a similar statement on Tuesday, justifying Israel’s “limited operations”.

It also added that it remains against the expansion of the ground assault and that a diplomatic solution is the only way to achieve lasting stability along Israel’s border with Lebanon.

‘Most dangerous’

Lebanon’s caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati warned that his country is facing “one of the most dangerous phases of its history” and urged the United Nations to provide aid for one million people displaced by Israel’s attacks over recent weeks.

“We urgently call for more aid to reinforce our ongoing efforts to provide basic support to displaced civilians,” Mikati said in a meeting with the UN representatives.

The UN’s humanitarian coordinator for Lebanon, Imran Riza, announced the launch of a $426m “flash appeal” for urgent humanitarian aid for civilians caught up in the conflict.

“Without sufficient resources, humanitarians risk leaving the population of an entire country without the support they urgently require,” Riza warned.

However, he added that no amount of aid can fully address the crisis if civilians continue to be targeted.

Liz Throssell, spokeswoman for the UN rights office, warned against “a large-scale ground invasion” that would only result in “greater suffering”.

INTERACTIVE-Israel-sends-ground-troops-into-Lebanon-1727773314.png

‘Territorial integrity’

The new phase of the Israeli operation sent alarm quickly spreading through the Middle East.

The United Nations’ peacekeeping force in Lebanon condemned the offensive, saying it violates Lebanon’s “sovereignty and territorial integrity”.

The UAE’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed “deep concern” over the escalation in fighting and “reaffirmed its unwavering position towards the unity of Lebanon, national sovereignty, and territorial integrity”.

The statement called for international support to prevent further escalation and stressed the importance of providing full protection to civilians.

President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan has “directed the delivery of an urgent $100m relief package to the people of Lebanon”, the ministry added.

Qatar’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Mohammed bin Abdulaziz al-Khulaifi warned on X that “aggression on Lebanon will inflict the worst”.

“Now more than ever, it needs our unwavering support to safeguard the country’s integrity and security. Standing with the brotherly people of Lebanon is not just a moral duty, but an imperative necessity,” he said.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024...acts-to-israels-ground-offensive-into-lebanon
P NEWSLETTER ISRAEL NEWS HEALTH & WELLNESS WORLD NEWS MIDDLE EAST
search
More...
Jerusalem Post
Separator
Israel-Hamas War

Al Jazeera only reports the Arab side of the Gaza war - comment​

Israel has claimed that several of the network’s reporters are actually Hamas operatives, a claim that Al Jazeera denies.​

By LINDA GRADSTEINMARCH 9, 2024 20:30
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • fb-messenger
 Al Jazeera bureau chief Wael Al-Dahdouh embraces his daughter and son as they attend the funeral on January 7 of his son, journalist Hamza Al-Dahdouh, who was killed in an Israeli strike in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip.  (photo credit: MOHAMMED SALEM/REUTERS)
Al Jazeera bureau chief Wael Al-Dahdouh embraces his daughter and son as they attend the funeral on January 7 of his son, journalist Hamza Al-Dahdouh, who was killed in an Israeli strike in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip. (photo credit: MOHAMMED SALEM/REUTERS)

ShowImage.ashx
Enlrage image

Israelis and Palestinians have been glued to the news since the October 7 Hamas massacre. But while Israelis usually watch local news on one of the four Hebrew-language channels or international stations like CNN, Arabic speakers all over the world are most likely to tune into to Al Jazeera. According to its website, Al Jazeera, which is headquartered in Qatar, broadcasts in more than 150 countries to more than 430 million people in both Arabic and English. With its online presence, the TV channel reaches more than one billion people a year.

“I was in Oxford last week and I watched a lot of Al Jazeera,” Alon Liel, the former director-general of the Israeli Foreign Ministry, told The Jerusalem Report. “They cover the war 23 and a half hours out of every 24. It’s basically full-time coverage and much more than the BBC.”

He said there is almost no coverage of Israel’s viewpoint or interviews with Israeli government officials, although he says they do interview individual Israelis. Liel has been on air five or six times since the war began. The Al Jazeera bureau in Jerusalem denied my request for an interview.



Al Jazeera on the ground in Gaza

Al Jazeera is one of the few outlets that have their own reporters on the ground in Gaza. According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, 99 journalists were killed in 2023; some 72 of them killed while reporting on Israel’s war in Gaza, many of them freelancers.

Israel has claimed that several of the network’s reporters are actually Hamas operatives, a claim that Al Jazeera denies. For example, Ismail Abu Omar, who was wounded in an Israeli airstrike near southern Gaza’s Rafah in mid-February, has been flown to Qatar for treatment. A cameraman for Al Jazeera was also wounded.

 AL JAZEERA headquarters in Doha: The Qatar-based television network is an evil empire, the writer maintains. (credit: Imad Creidi/Reuters)
Enlrage image
AL JAZEERA headquarters in Doha: The Qatar-based television network is an evil empire, the writer maintains. (credit: Imad Creidi/Reuters)
Al Jazeera said Abu Omar’s right leg was blown off in an Israeli drone strike, and doctors are trying to save his left leg. Israeli army spokesman Lt.-Col. Avichay Adraee said Abu Omar served as a deputy commander in Hamas’s East Khan Yunis battalion. He said that on October 7, Abu Omar infiltrated into Israel and filmed during Hamas’s attack on Kibbutz Nir Oz.

Al Jazeera rejected the allegations and said that Israel targeted Abu Omar.

“The network condemns the accusations against its journalists and recalls Israel’s long record of lies and fabrication of evidence through which it seeks to hide its heinous crimes,” Al Jazeera said in a statement. “Al Jazeera’s employment policies stipulate that employees are not to engage in any political affiliations that may affect their professionalism.”

Israel has long said that Al Jazeera is not an independent news service, and there have been growing calls to close the network’s offices in Israel.

“The Qatar-based Al Jazeera television network is an evil empire,” wrote columnist David Weinberg recently in The Jerusalem Post. “It glorifies Hamas, including its ‘heroic’ massacres of October 7 and ongoing ‘resistance’ against Israel and all forms of Iranian proxy terrorism against Israel. It aids Hamas by reporting on IDF forces concentrated along the Gaza border. It is actively drumming up Ramadan terrorism against Israelis, too.”


Stay updated with the latest news!
Subscribe to The Jerusalem Post Newsletter
Subscribe Now

Al Jazeera is based in Qatar and funded by the government. The fact that Qatar is actively engaged in negotiations for the release of the more than 100 Israeli hostages that Hamas is still holding in Gaza means that it is unlikely that Israel will make any moves to close Al Jazeera.

“We are in a delicate situation,” said Barak Bouks, a senior research fellow at the Europa Institute at Bar-Ilan University.

Al Jazeera is watched throughout the Arab world and has a lot of influence, he said. For example, on October 17 a missile landed in the courtyard of the Al Ahli Hospital in Gaza. Hamas said it was an Israeli fired rocket and that some 500 people were killed. Israel insisted that it was not responsible, and after weeks of investigation most international news outlets concluded that Israel was not responsible and that the missile was fired from Gaza and had fallen short. In addition, the number of dead was in the dozens, not 500. Yet Al Jazeera continued to report on the “Al Ahli massacre” for weeks.

Israeli outlets including Channels 11 (Kan), 12 (Keshet), 13 (Reshet) and the right-leaning Channel 14 have also focused on Israeli deaths in the war and Israeli experience. They have also run a banner with the war’s slogan “Yachad Nenatzeach” (“Together We Will Win”). At the same time, there is coverage of the destruction and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, as well as close coverage of Hamas.

“Al Jazeera is totally committed to Qatar which is pro-Hamas,” Bouks said. “Even if they have interviews with Israelis or families of hostages, the presentation is 100 percent Hamas. There is no impartiality.”

The Arabic Al Jazeera channel began broadcasting in 1996, and the English-language channel 10 years later. Over the years the channels have become more influential, especially as Al Jazeera English has hired journalists from the BBC and CNN.

“They are very professional. The people on the ground are good photographers – it’s not amateurs,” Liel said. “But they are also hostile to Israel and adding to Israel’s problems in The Hague [where the court is hearing a case against Israel]. Al Jazeera has a share in undermining Israel’s standing.”■

 
UN resolution 1701 is important here


The terrorist Islamic supremacists did not honour it
The UN is a bunch of cucks. I don't know what they're for.
At least you can throw that in their faces the next time they bark.
 
UN resolution 1701 is important here


The terrorist Islamic supremacists did not honour it

Didn't honor it, but trying to invoke it like the pussies they are.

Embarrassing. And this is after they planned another October 7th-like attack on Israel.
 


Interesting

I wonder if Netanyahu believes that. Iran under the Shah was friendly to Israel, but so is Saudi Arabia under MBS. Doesn’t mean it’s the popular will of the people. The Shah didn’t like to speak publicly about his ties to Israel because it didn’t sit well with his population.

Iran has changed a lot since 2500 years ago.
 
Its a nationalist conflict at heart where religious sites and beliefs play a prominent role not unlike in the Balkans.
What nationalistic conflict does Pakistan or Malaysia have with Israel?

There are still Protestant Loyalists in Northern Ireland.
But there is no more Troubles despite the fact that Northern Ireland is still separate from the Republic. That's proof that such a conflict was not about religion.

Yes just as the Abraham Accords happened.
Where States that had zero grievances with Israel were bribed the fuck out to recognize Israel? isn't that proof that the conflict is religion in nature?
Take for example the other side that hates Israel which is the far left, despite Cuba or Venezuela breaking relations with Israel, they still recognize Israel.

I'm sure "a lot" do and I've said as much. I still maintain that the conclusions you've drawn don't necessarily follow from the sources you cited and also what we mean by "a lot"
The conclusions is pretty clear when we control for religion there is a big ass differences in the views of Israel, when we ask MUSLIMS what they think of Israel the overwhelming majority will express negative answers.

The idea that the main driving force between Israel and Muslim countries animosity isn't related to religion is disingenous.
 
What nationalistic conflict does Pakistan or Malaysia have with Israel?
The conflict between the Arabs and Israelis is nationalist but yes of course religion matters and I've said the further away you get from the epicenter of the conflict the less its about the nationalist element and the more its about religion and stuff like the Temple Mount.
But there is no more Troubles despite the fact that Northern Ireland is still separate from the Republic. That's proof that such a conflict was not about religion.
You don't think religion played a part in the Struggles?
Where States that had zero grievances with Israel were bribed the fuck out to recognize Israel? isn't that proof that the conflict is religion in nature?
Take for example the other side that hates Israel which is the far left, despite Cuba or Venezuela breaking relations with Israel, they still recognize Israel.
Many Arab states in the Arab League also had zero direct grievances with Assad before expelling him and then admitting him back. The ones more directly involved, like Jordan, were against normalization with Assad
The conclusions is pretty clear when we control for religion there is a big ass differences in the views of Israel, when we ask MUSLIMS what they think of Israel the overwhelming majority will express negative answers.
Your own source for the opinion of British Muslims, some of the more conservatives ones in the Western world, showed that less than half answered no to "Does Israel have a right to exist as a Jewish homeland" and even still you had to misleadingly frame it to make it seem more sinister than it really was.
The idea that the main driving force between Israel and Muslim countries animosity isn't related to religion is disingenous.
I never denied that it plays a role and in fact I've said the opposite.
Its certainly fair to say the Temple Mount matters a lot to global Muslim opinion but the war in Gaza and attacks on Lebanon had generated lots of outrage despite not affecting the Temple Mount so its more than that.
Like I said I don't deny that religion plays a part
But I think you're reaching with your conclusions and making claims that aren't backed up by your sources.
 
Last edited:
That be the same UN, you know UNRWA, whose employees participated in the attempted genocide of Israel last October and who hire numerous Hamas terrorists? Yeh, they're a bastion of truth and honesty alright.
Hey you thirsty bitch. We get it. Every nonIsrael source is antisemitic. Now go play pick me girl with someone else.
 

US out of step as world reacts to Israel’s ground offensive into Lebanon​

Many countries and global bodies call for restraint amid Israel’s expanded military operations, but the US offers support.

The United States appeared out of step with the rest of the globe as it pledged its support for Israel’s ground incursion into Lebanon.

While voices from across the world on Tuesday urged a ceasefire and a step back from the brink of all-out war, Washington declared the “limited” ground offensive into southern Lebanon as “Israel’s right to defend itself”.

Israeli troops advanced into Lebanon overnight on Tuesday in a widely anticipated move. The military said in a statement that the raids were “limited, localised and targeted” against Hezbollah.

However, the advance further raises the risk of a wider escalation in the fight with the Iran-backed armed group or even across the region, and the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Japan have all been quick to express concern.

US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said he told his Israeli counterpart, Yoav Gallant, that Washington agrees on the need for a ground offensive to rid Lebanon’s southern border area of Hezbollah weapons and other means it can use to carry out attacks across the border.

“I made it clear that the United States supports Israel’s right to defend itself,” Austin said.

The White House National Security Council made a similar statement on Tuesday, justifying Israel’s “limited operations”.

It also added that it remains against the expansion of the ground assault and that a diplomatic solution is the only way to achieve lasting stability along Israel’s border with Lebanon.

‘Most dangerous’

Lebanon’s caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati warned that his country is facing “one of the most dangerous phases of its history” and urged the United Nations to provide aid for one million people displaced by Israel’s attacks over recent weeks.

“We urgently call for more aid to reinforce our ongoing efforts to provide basic support to displaced civilians,” Mikati said in a meeting with the UN representatives.

The UN’s humanitarian coordinator for Lebanon, Imran Riza, announced the launch of a $426m “flash appeal” for urgent humanitarian aid for civilians caught up in the conflict.

“Without sufficient resources, humanitarians risk leaving the population of an entire country without the support they urgently require,” Riza warned.

However, he added that no amount of aid can fully address the crisis if civilians continue to be targeted.

Liz Throssell, spokeswoman for the UN rights office, warned against “a large-scale ground invasion” that would only result in “greater suffering”.

INTERACTIVE-Israel-sends-ground-troops-into-Lebanon-1727773314.png

‘Territorial integrity’

The new phase of the Israeli operation sent alarm quickly spreading through the Middle East.

The United Nations’ peacekeeping force in Lebanon condemned the offensive, saying it violates Lebanon’s “sovereignty and territorial integrity”.

The UAE’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed “deep concern” over the escalation in fighting and “reaffirmed its unwavering position towards the unity of Lebanon, national sovereignty, and territorial integrity”.

The statement called for international support to prevent further escalation and stressed the importance of providing full protection to civilians.

President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan has “directed the delivery of an urgent $100m relief package to the people of Lebanon”, the ministry added.

Qatar’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Mohammed bin Abdulaziz al-Khulaifi warned on X that “aggression on Lebanon will inflict the worst”.

“Now more than ever, it needs our unwavering support to safeguard the country’s integrity and security. Standing with the brotherly people of Lebanon is not just a moral duty, but an imperative necessity,” he said.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024...acts-to-israels-ground-offensive-into-lebanon
Trully fucked how offside the US is on this issue.
 
The conflict between the Arabs and Israelis is nationalist but yes of course religion matters and I've said the further away you get from the epicenter of the conflict the less its about the nationalist element and the more its about religion and stuff like the Temple Mount.

You don't think religion played a part in the Struggles?

Many Arab states in the Arab League also had zero direct grievances with Assad before expelling him and then admitting him back. The ones more directly involved, like Jordan, were against normalization with Assad

Your own source for the opinion of British Muslims, some of the more conservatives ones in the Western world, showed that less than half answered no to "Does Israel have a right to exist as a Jewish homeland" and even still you had to misleadingly frame it to make it seem more sinister than it really was.

I never denied that it plays a role and in fact I've said the opposite.


But I think you're reaching with your conclusions and making claims that aren't backed up by your sources.
Its the old story of colonizer and indigenous people.
 
Back
Top