Violence/Genocide: Do not condone violence or genocide on a person or group of people. You are free to attack a person or groups ideas but you are crossing the line when calling for violence. This will be heavily enforced in threads with breaking news involving victims.

Here's why more brands, like Nike with Colin Kaepernick, are openly liberal

Discussion in 'The War Room' started by 58miles, Sep 4, 2018.

  1. 58miles Black Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    5,542
    Likes Received:
    244
    This article explains why Nike and other brands are taking liberal political stances and why more brands will follow in the future. It also explains why conservative brands are all but doomed to failure.
    • Nike will gain a lot more than it will lose from making Colin Kaepernick the face of an ad campaign.
    • Wading into politics can still alienate customers. What's new is it can do a lot to attract them, too.
    • Most brands' target consumer is younger and more liberal on social issues than the average voter — so political brands will tend to be liberal.
    Michael Jordan probably never actually said "Republicans buy sneakers, too." But that apocryphal quote reflects a common sentiment for consumer product marketers: Better to stay away from political controversies so you can keep selling on both sides of the aisle.
    Nike, which has drawn both praise and criticism for placing Colin Kaepernick at the center of its "Just Do It" anniversary campaign, is not following the maxim.

    Its choice — along with the recent choices of other corporations to wade into political disputes, as with Delta's and Dick's Sporting Goods' recent brushes with gun-rights activists — tells us something about new political incentives facing brands.
    This isn't "woke capital." Companies are maximizing profits as they always did, but they're responding to incentives that have shifted to encourage political participation by brands.

    There is still a downside risk for brands that get political: They may alienate some of their customers. The people posting videos of themselves destroying their own bought-and-paid-for Nike sneakers may not buy new ones anytime soon.

    What's new is brands are seeing a major upside risk. As more consumers come to expect brands to reflect their moral and political values, a brand that takes a side on a controversial issue can strengthen its bond with a consumer segment, making them willing to buy more or to buy at a higher price.

    But there is an asymmetry: This mostly works if you engage from the left, not the right.

    Why brands are liberal now
    After the Delta-NRA flap, I wrote this:
    "Socially liberal segments of the public punch above their weight as potential customers (and, in some cases, as potential employees) for these companies. Think about who companies most want to advertise to: people who have a lot of disposable income and aren't too old. This advertiser preference is why television ratings are reported in terms of adults 25 to 54 (or sometimes even 18 to 49) and it's why networks like Bravo tout their unusually upscale viewer base to prospective advertisers. Appealing to senior citizens is a good way to win an election, but it's not a good way to sell most consumer products and services."

    Unfortunately for conservatives, markets for consumer products are not democracies. As American politics gets more polarized by age and less polarized by income, most brands' target customer will tend to move left relative to the country's political median, even as the average voter sits to the right of the whole country's political median.
    For example, a poll conducted for The Washington Post in Mayfound that 63% of respondents over age 50 thought it was "never" appropriate to protest by kneeling during the national anthem; only 38% of respondents under 30 said the same.
    Younger Americans are also more ethnically diverse than older Americans, so a company trying to sell to young people is naturally selling into a much more diverse "electorate" than a political party running a national election in which the average congressional district is significantly whiter than the country as a whole.
    So, think about the demographic of who's most upset about Kaepernick's protest movement, and then think about how much an athletic-apparel company needs to concern itself with the opinions of senior citizens, and then think about why Nike thinks this ad campaign will improve its sales.

    There is also the problem that conservatives are desperately uncool.

    You'd think some brands would try to get on the conservative side of big political issues — you make the conservative sneaker, I'll make the liberal sneaker, and both of us can enjoy higher profit margins because we don't have to compete with each other on price. Alas, the conservative shoemaker will face a coolness deficit with not-especially-political consumers, not to mention with the left-leaning creative professionals he'll need to market the shoes in the first place.

    Finally, as politics has gotten more polarized by education and urbanization, it's likely the most influential consumers — the "connectors" and "mavens" and "salesmen" Malcolm Gladwell writes about in "The Tipping Point" — are more disproportionately left-of-center than they used to be. This is an advantage for liberal-identified brands and a hindrance for conservative-identified ones.

    That is, the "Big Sort" that has made the congressional map more difficult for Democrats is simultaneously increasing liberals' influence in the market for consumer products and services.
    One cheer for woke brands
    Where politics has a very direct bearing on the bottom line — trade policy, labor policy, tax policy — you can expect Nike and other companies to prioritize those direct effects over public image, whether that means aligning with the right or the left.
    So, if you're a liberal, you shouldn't expect Nike to be a reliable partner on every issue — and you shouldn't be naive about how the political interests of stockholders will often diverge from those of consumers, workers, or the broad public.

    But politics is about coalitions. Someone doesn't have to be a reliable partner to be a useful one. Liberals should welcome Nike to the resistance, while critically watching its future actions.
    https://www.businessinsider.com/nike-colin-kaepernick-ad-brands-more-liberal-2018-9?op=1
     
  2. 58miles Black Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    5,542
    Likes Received:
    244

     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2018
  3. 58miles Black Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    5,542
    Likes Received:
    244
  4. DIDM Honk Honk Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2018
    Messages:
    3,384
    Likes Received:
    0
    NIKE is a billion dollar corporation, because they use child slave labor

    I’m really glad you support that
     
  5. tehJameson RANCH Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2015
    Messages:
    4,420
    Likes Received:
    124
    Location:
    Mars
    Like they give a shit if a bunch of dumb rednecks don't buy there products anymore lol
     
  6. octopus Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    909
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know... some people will avoid their products, others will buy extra... probably end up being a push like most things, I don't know how much stronger and diverse a brand like Nike can really get. Literally everybody has Nike gear, seems unnecessary.
     
  7. DIDM Honk Honk Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2018
    Messages:
    3,384
    Likes Received:
    0
    Money talks

    Stealing shoes doesn’t count towards sales
     
  8. OCGSC Blue Belt

    Joined:
    May 30, 2015
    Messages:
    868
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    In the fortress of conspiracies.
    Yeah a ton if companies do.
     
  9. JamesRussler You can call me Jimmy Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Messages:
    8,884
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    "Get woke, go broke"
     
  10. DIDM Honk Honk Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2018
    Messages:
    3,384
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well in this thread they are praising NIKE
     
  11. oldshadow Steel Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    30,136
    Likes Received:
    1,127
    Location:
    Virginia U.S.A.
  12. Ripskater Johnny Mac's friend Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    5,042
    Likes Received:
    1
    First, I think there's a lot of self proclaimed "liberals" that probably don't like Kaepernick's message
    -cops are pigs socks
    -don't stand for the anthem (anti-American)
    -protest July 4th Independence Day for American racsim by going to Africa (anti-American)
    -wearing Communist t-shirts

    I don't know that I'd call Colin liberal. I'd say he's more social justice warrior+ Communism +anti-American. I'd use the word far Left to describe Colin.
     
  13. WaylonMercy5150 Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,431
    Likes Received:
    2,049
    Location:
    Mexico City
    Kaepernick is like a Syth Lord to rednecks. "Kaepernick is sponsered by Nike, better burn that one pair of shoes I have and cut the logo off my socks." He controls their lives. Pretty funny stuff, Darth Kaepernick.
     
  14. tehJameson RANCH Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2015
    Messages:
    4,420
    Likes Received:
    124
    Location:
    Mars
    Lol found one.
     
  15. Ripskater Johnny Mac's friend Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    5,042
    Likes Received:
    1
    Also, I think companies are becoming more leftist politically because of media and colleges teaching kids PC culture, cultural Marxism and social Justice. With a little "America was never great" type of attitude.
     
  16. Mark Hunts FIST Black Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2007
    Messages:
    6,646
    Likes Received:
    306
    Location:
    Work
    I love how the left is becoming fans of Fortune 500 companies now. Welcome to the 80s.
     
  17. HomerThompson Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    41,450
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Terror Lake
    Take your bullshit somewhere else. The right in America has never given half a shit about corporate responsibility. You're lucky your head didn't explode from the extreme hypocrisy of typing that.
     
  18. HomerThompson Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    41,450
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Terror Lake
    *their
     
  19. HomerThompson Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    41,450
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Terror Lake
    What does this have to do with the concept described in the OP?

    Just randomly demonizing NIKE is unrelated to the trend of retailers becoming more political.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.