im not saying im a wizz at detecting liars but my point is having these "experts" is the equivalent to taking a blood sugar test..it isn't always accurate
much like learning from a book these guys use guidelines and "rules" to determine someone is lieing based of their behavioral patterns and this would be fullproof had mankind been robots with the exact same programming....but we ain't people respond and act differently kinda like how some people can watch you dead in the eye and lie without giving out a clue while others may show a "sign"
long story short bringing in these "experts" is just a huge waste of time
im not saying im a wizz at detecting liars but my point is having these "experts" is the equivalent to taking a blood sugar test..it isn't always accurate
much like learning from a book these guys use guidelines and "rules" to determine someone is lieing based of their behavioral patterns and this would be fullproof had mankind been robots with the exact same programming....but we ain't people respond and act differently kinda like how some people can watch you dead in the eye and lie without giving out a clue while others may show a "sign"
long story short bringing in these "experts" is just a huge waste of time
It's not an exact science which is why it's not used to prove guilt/innocence in any court of law I'm aware of. That being said reading body language, subconscious signals, eye contact, gestures movement etc is hugely telling when used contextually and understood to a relative degree. It's not indisputable proof of anything in of itself but can be extremely telling in an intuitive sense if analyzed and studied. Most of us understand it to some degree whether we actively think of it or not, those that study it are naturally going to have a more acute awareness of this social "skill"
It's not an exact science which is why it's not used to prove guilt/innocence in any court of law I'm aware of. That being said reading body language, subconscious signals, eye contact, gestures movement etc is hugely telling when used contextually and understood to a relative degree. It's not indisputable proof of anything in of itself but can be extremely telling in an intuitive sense if analyzed and studied. Most of us understand it to some degree whether we actively think of it or not, those that study it are naturally going to have a more acute awareness of this social "skill"
The problem is that you are usually not aware that you are doing those things.a.changing tone in voice
b.facial expression
c.sugercoating words
d.subliminal wording
is this what these morons got paid to do?? that shit is pure common sense and even then so anybody can manipulate those habits if they wanted to at will
Sicilians are great liars ... the best. I'm Sicilian. My father was the heavyweight champion of Sicilian liars and from watching him growing up I learned the pantomime. See, a guy's got seventeen different things he can do to give himself away when he's telling a lie - a guy's got seventeen pantomines (women have 20). But anyway, if you know these things like you know your own face, well they beat lie detectors all to hell. So what we got here is a little game of show and tell. You don't want to show me nothing, but you're telling me everything ...