Heavyweight > Light heavyweight

cyrusthevyrus

Banned
Banned
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
9,259
Reaction score
1,440
A lot of people say heavyweight is dead. But it is still better than LHW !

HW: (Cormier), Stipe, Volkov, Blaydes, Tuivasa. Even Ngannou, Lewis, don't even count old Werdum, old JDS, expired Overeem and Arlovski. But there is a longer list.

What do we have at LHW?
(Cormier), Volkan and? Guys like Manuwa, OSP, Corey, Latifi :)))) ? Really? Gus is not fighting anymore, Shogun is expired
 
A LHW is HW champion right now.

LHW > Heavyweight.
 
Two disparate lands, yet they know but one master.
DC226 - 1.jpg
 
Last edited:
It’s a sad day when I realize bantamweight is the division I care about the most at the moment.
 
A LHW is HW champion right now.

LHW > Heavyweight.
nah, he's actually a heavyweight who went down and dominated light heavyweights (minus JJ) and then went back home to heavyweight and took that back over ;-)
 
MMath....again. :|

a1 = 10, a2 = 1 , a3 = 3

b1 = 8, b2 = 5, b3 = 6

this means As are better than Bs? ...
This supports his argument not yours. You supported your argument by showing us fighter names, he supported his by pointing out who won when they fought. In your example above you again just put up a bunch of letters and numbers, but make no statement about when they A and B actually fought each other. So for now he has a stronger argument.
 
Both UFC and USADA killed the whole roster with bad booking and shitty testing. WW is the only division properly working.
 
Atleast we got Krylov back at LHW. Any fighter under 30 is a good thing.
 
they're both terrible. DC is great, jon jones is great, and there are maybe 3 others in either division worth talking about. they should buy Rico Verhoeven from Glory.
 
This supports his argument not yours. You supported your argument by showing us fighter names, he supported his by pointing out who won when they fought. In your example above you again just put up a bunch of letters and numbers, but make no statement about when they A and B actually fought each other. So for now he has a stronger argument.
learn some logics :)
 
This supports his argument not yours. You supported your argument by showing us fighter names, he supported his by pointing out who won when they fought. In your example above you again just put up a bunch of letters and numbers, but make no statement about when they A and B actually fought each other. So for now he has a stronger argument.

They all are on drugs
Fcking letters
 
Heavyweight is always great. Even a battle between washed-up hw legends like Mir and Fedor, is more compelling than most fights that can be made in the lower weight classes. Who are these milk-toast mma fans who rather watch elkins vs bermudez than Hunt vs Lewis?
 
super heavyweight > bantamweight
 
Back
Top