HB2 (NC Bathroom Bill) stands, not repealed.

If one girl is sexually molested or raped because this law allows men legal access, it's one too many.

Does your gimmick apply that logic to christian priests who rape young boys?

We have a hell of lot more instances of that then any for tranny assaults using bathroom admitting privileges for cover. If a law can prevent just one child from being raped by a christian priest, should we enact it?

How does your fake persona square that logic?
 
It's pretty amusing watching the conservative Jihad against transsexuals after getting their asses handed to them by gays. They might have just found an enemy they're capable of defeating. Everybody has a gay friend or family member but the same can't be said about trans.

Almost as odd as people not believing in biological science, I thought the right was the ones that didn't believe in science lol
 
Preventing people from redefining reality is not unimportant.
The big problems come because no one bothered to fight to the little ones.

if someone drops a grenade at your feet, you don't ignore it just because of the whistling sound of approaching bombs.

That isn't a good analogy for the situation. The open violation of the US constitution is the grenade at your feet. Tranny bathrooms at worst are termites on your foundation. I tend to put it more in the realm of something completely inconsequential, like a beetle moving a dung pile.
 
All these stupid fucking share bathroom laws do is fuck up every concert I've been to since these bum ass liberals started with this horseshit. When the chicks room is a fucking mile long, they all pile into the men's room saying "obama said we could". No fucking joke about that either.
giphy.gif
 
Colorado, Iowa, Oregon, and Washington all have laws allowing transgender people the right to use a gender identity-appropriate restroom. Has there been a statistically significant rise in the types of crimes you are concerned about? If there was a surge in such crimes, were the suspects/convicted persons in the class of individuals you suspect would be using these laws to exploit children (ie, men or transgendered persons using women's restrooms as a place to molest children)?
I can go to the fitness centers shower room and tell them I feel like I woman, and look at the nude women in the shower and they legally can't do anything?

Awesome.
 
This is one of those nationwide stories that shouldn't' have been nationwide, imo. Let Oregon and Washington handle it the way they want to, let N. Carolina do the same. This shouldn't be some national conversation. North Carolina people only should be the ones debating this.
If corporations didn't up and leave it wouldn't be a national issue.

Corporations were sticking it to States rights, showing the government who is really in charge.
 
Great news.

Though conservatives really should stop making consequentionalist arguments against 'transgender bathroom rights' i.e. arguing against it by expressing concern for little girls being raped by men in bathrooms. These consequentionalist arguments only push the discussion away from the main issue here. The problem is transgenderism itself.
 
That isn't a good analogy for the situation. The open violation of the US constitution is the grenade at your feet. Tranny bathrooms at worst are termites on your foundation. I tend to put it more in the realm of something completely inconsequential, like a beetle moving a dung pile.

Then your thoughts are narrow, and your reality inflexible.
Carry on fighting the battles you've already lost though. I'm sure it's a great way to kill time.
 
It's a silly proposition anyway. Transgenders already have a toilet for their own purposes:

1242796267486489866Handicapped_Accessible_sign.svg.hi.png
 
Unless you can provide proof
It's common sense. And only a matter of time. I've already said that you will have phony trans perverts going into girl's rooms. No longer can a female alert people that a man walked into the girl's room. She will be labelled a bigot. Unfortunately some young girl will be greatly harmed because this law lets the perverts get more brave in doing this.
 
Does your gimmick apply that logic to christian priests who rape young boys?

We have a hell of lot more instances of that then any for tranny assaults using bathroom admitting privileges for cover. If a law can prevent just one child from being raped by a christian priest, should we enact it?

How does your fake persona square that logic?
You aren't making any sense. You're just rustled again.
 
If corporations didn't up and leave it wouldn't be a national issue.

Corporations were sticking it to States rights, showing the government who is really in charge.
That's how the free market works, though. So I don't really have an issue with that.
 
That's how the free market works, though. So I don't really have an issue with that.
I don't either. I just don't like how everyone is blaming the state (even within the State, republicans blamed him) for deciding their own laws and the people who pushed this were largely far left leaning/socialists... and rather than boycotting the companies they blamed the State.

It's like (obvious hyperbole is obvious) the companies could force the State to commit genocide and fuck the morals of the people that voted, the people would still turn against their principles for a little bit of cash.
 
Great news.

Though conservatives really should stop making consequentionalist arguments against 'transgender bathroom rights' i.e. arguing against it by expressing concern for little girls being raped by men in bathrooms. These consequentionalist arguments only push the discussion away from the main issue here. The problem is transgenderism itself.

Could you expand on what you mean by this problem with transgenderism?
 
Could you expand on what you mean by this problem with transgenderism?
I'm not him but I'd like to answer. Transgenderism is mentally ill behavior. We should be encouraging these people to get counseling for mental, emotional and sexuality issues. Not encouraging men to dress as a woman, get surgery and take female hormones. You saw what happened with Bruce Jenner.
 
were gonna keep winning until were sick of winning

its 2016. stop acting like its still 2015

get with the times liberals, youre on the wrong side of history
Get on the right side of spelling and punctuation, please.
 
I don't have a problem with laws being passed that prevents discrimination for things like people being fired for being gay, but government forcing people to use gender over sex as a defining characteristic is just absurd.
 
It's a shame that their economy has to suffer for exercising common sense.
 
This is one of the weirdest arguments.

Side A has bathrooms marked Male and Female, want biological males to use the male one, biological females to use the female one. Okay, I'm fine with that.

Side B wants bathroom genders to be so that someone who may have been born a male or female but has permanently and irrevocably switched gender orientations can use the other bathroom. Okay, I'm fine with that, score one for side B.

Not good enough. Side B wants to make it so that someone can ostensibly change orientation on a whim, making the change of genders whenever they please, and making them indistinguishable from someone who might be going into the other gender's bathroom for sexual gratification. I assume, perhaps incorrectly, that going into the other sex's bathroom, dressing room, shower, or locker room for gratification purposes is still considered wrong at this point. Now I'm no longer on board with side B's cause. It's time for side A to push back.

Side A says no, there's problems with that stance, that it makes it impossible for us to distinguish between genuine gender-changers and perverts, which will just make for all sorts of issues and problems. Not to mention having to change the signage and/or structure of every bathroom in every public place in the country. Should we legislate a third gender neutral bathroom for every business?

Side B says well, you just need to stop being so uptight, there's always been trans in the "other" bathrooms, just get over it, it doesn't make a difference who uses what bathrooms, put us all in unisex bathrooms for all we care.

That's when I say this: If you're telling us we shouldn't care what bathroom you use, why don't you just adopt that attitude yourselves, and leave things the way they are? If it's okay for side B to have women and girls put up with men in their locker rooms and showers and bathrooms, if they're gender-agnostic enough to just ignore the "Men" or "Women" labels on the doors, if it doesn't matter if they just made them all "Men/Women/Whoever" signs, why have this fight?

If you don't care about the labels on the doors, and it's supposed to mean nothing to us you which one you use, just do us a favor and go with the one that matches your genitalia. Honestly, what's wrong with bothering less people?

The left today seems caught in a self-contradictory state of being offended by the simplest, most common things, yet they're willing to absolutely maximize the amount that they offend, inconvenience, and create discomfort for others.
 
Back
Top