- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Messages
- 30,549
- Reaction score
- 3,093
I liked that they used Britney Palmer last card. She’s still smoking.
2004 Account was the guy trying to start a conversation about it iirc.Obviously. Thats why I"m just trying to start a conversation about it.
... And I don't mean the cards I mean the way they program viewers through celebrity tweets (that sometimes have the clear loser as winning the fight in progress)...do they use some tweets to help further confuse and blur the line of who is clearly winning the fight? I saw a tweet or two this last fight card that had the wrong dude as winning and it was evident (can't remember which one, it was some prelim bout I think).
Perception steering and obfuscation
Also showing the gambling odds during the fights? What's the real purpose behind that? Isn't that a conflict of interest at the very least? Pretty unethical isn't it?
how bout the stupid commercial they play over and over again on repeat with kimbo and nick diaz... And I don't mean the cards I mean the way they program viewers through celebrity tweets (that sometimes have the clear loser as winning the fight in progress)...do they use some tweets to help further confuse and blur the line of who is clearly winning the fight? I saw a tweet or two this last fight card that had the wrong dude as winning and it was evident (can't remember which one, it was some prelim bout I think).
Perception steering and obfuscation
Also showing the gambling odds during the fights? What's the real purpose behind that? Isn't that a conflict of interest at the very least? Pretty unethical isn't it?
No shit, but you are the one who is trying to put out this conversation by saying to ignore it.2004 Account was the guy trying to start a conversation about it iirc.
I ignore all that shit and pay attention to the fights.
I didn't say everyone should ignore it. I said I ignore it.No shit, but you are the one who is trying to put out this conversation by saying to ignore it.
I like the gambling odds. I think it keeps commentary bias in check. When bisping is going off about how someone is doing no damage, or not effective and he’s obviously wrong, anik pulls up the betting odds and bisping backs down realizing not everyone in the world agrees with what he’s saying.... And I don't mean the cards I mean the way they program viewers through celebrity tweets (that sometimes have the clear loser as winning the fight in progress)...do they use some tweets to help further confuse and blur the line of who is clearly winning the fight? I saw a tweet or two this last fight card that had the wrong dude as winning and it was evident (can't remember which one, it was some prelim bout I think).
Perception steering and obfuscation
Also showing the gambling odds during the fights? What's the real purpose behind that? Isn't that a conflict of interest at the very least? Pretty unethical isn't it?
Do you remember some moments this happened? Like, the gambling odds are shown and Bisping or other commentators backs down? Would be good if you provide for us to check.I like the gambling odds. I think it keeps commentary bias in check. When bisping is going off about how someone is doing no damage, or not effective and he’s obviously wrong, anik pulls up the betting odds and bisping backs down realizing not everyone in the world agrees with what he’s saying.
I bet that’s what people were saying when the reality show called The Ultimate Fighter started... that it was some sort gimmick watering down MMA...This is the future of Hollywood MMA, unfortunately. Soon belts and number-one contenders will be decided by a reality show and WME will start harvesting stars for their own media. They’ve played the long game so far but things are going to break in 2021
Ladies and gentleman, and here we have the first typical asshole response from an d-bag that felt the need to insult someone gratuitously...You’re a longtime fan and think betting odds are unethical? They’ve been in the UFC for years you fucking casual